How cited: Abilene Independent School District v. Marks · Go Syfert

Abilene Independent School District v. Marks (2008)

green · 24 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 11 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200920172026
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Dist. v. Marks, 261 S.W.3d 262, 271 (Tex. App.-Eastland 2008, no pet.) (holding, in worker’s compensation case, that orthopedic surgeon was qualified to testify that teacher’s knee injury was caused by student kicking teacher in knee); LMC Complete Automotive, Inc. v. Burke, 229 S.W.3d 469, 479 (Tex. App.Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, pet. denied) (indicating, in case in which orthopedic surgeon testified that plaintiffs back injuries were caused by on-the-job accident, that inju…
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Dist. v. Marks, 261 S.W.3d 262, 268 (Tex.App.-Eastland 2008, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Dist. v. Marks, 261 S.W.3d 262, 268 (Tex. App.—Eastland 2008, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Dist. v. Marks , 261 S.W.3d 262, 268 (Tex. App.—Eastland 2008, no pet.) .
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
School Dist. v. Marks , 261 S.W.3d 262, 268-69 (Tex. App.-Eastland 2008, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
School Dist. v. Marks, 261 S.W.3d 262, 268-69 (Tex. App.–Eastland 2008, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Dist. v. Marks, 261 S.W.3d 262, 269 (Tex. App.—Eastland 2008, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Dist. v. Marks, 261 S.W.3d 262, 268 (Tex. App.—Eastland 2008, no pet.) (“In the absence of expert medical testimony, laypersons do not have the common knowledge 8Stryker’s only challenge to the elements of assault as defined in penal code section 22.01(a)(1) was that Sample’s actions did not cause Cavazos’s injuries.
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Dist. v. Marks, 261 S.W.3d 262, 268 (Tex.App.-Eastland 2008, no pet.). [3] [4] [5] Evidence of the extent of impairment is limited in the trial court to that presented to the Commission unless the trial court finds the claimant's condition has substantially worsened.
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Dist. v. Marks, 261 S.W.3d 262, 271-72 (Tex. App. - Eastland 2008, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Dist. v. Marks, 261 S.W.3d 262, 268 (Tex.App.-Eastland 2008, no pet.).