How cited: Farris v. State · Go Syfert

Farris v. State (1990)

green · 228 citation events across 5 courts. Showing the 50 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
All Yellow 1 Green 49
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199020082026
Sort: By significance · Most recent
yellow Vernon v. State (1992)
But See · Tex. Crim. App. · signal: but see · 2 citations in this opinion
But see, e.g., Farris v. State, 819 S.W.2d 490, 497 (Tex.Crim.App.1990) (sufficiency of the evidence to prove “deliberately” should be evaluated against a standard of which the jury is deliberately kept ignorant).
green Jim Jack Thompson, III v. State (2015)
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
App. 2002) -------------- 20, 21, 24 Davis v. State, 177 S.W.3d 355, 358-59 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2005, no pet.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11 Farris v. State, 819 S.W.2d 490, 495 (Tex. Crim.
green Ashley Elaine Brewer v. the State of Texas (2024)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Farris v. State, 819 S.W.2d 490, 496 (Tex. Crim.
green Ashley Elaine Brewer v. the State of Texas (2024)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Farris v. State, 819 S.W.2d 490, 496 (Tex. Crim.
green Torrey Lynne Henderson v. the State of Texas (2023)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
App. 1991) (quoting Farris v. State, 819 S.W.2d 490, 495 (Tex. Crim.
green Ryan Jefferson Mead v. the State of Texas (2021)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
App. 1991) (quoting Farris v. State, 819 S.W.2d 490, 495 (Tex. Crim.
green Robert Ortiz v. State (2019)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Jackson, 443 U.S. at 326 ; Farris v. State, 819 S.W.2d 490, 495 (Tex. Crim.
green Donald Ray Haynes v. State (2016)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Jackson, 443 U.S. at 326 ; Farris v. State, 819 S.W.2d 490, 495 (Tex. Crim.
green Pamela Gwynn Krick v. State (2016)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
App. 1991) (quoting Farris v. State, 819 S.W.2d 490, 495 (Tex. Crim.
green Pedro Elizondo Martinez, Jr. v. State (2015)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
App. 1991) (quoting Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 326 (1979); Farris v. State, 819 S.W.2d 490, 495 (Tex. Crim.
green Clark, Jack Theotrice Jr. (2015)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Farris v. State, 819 S.W.2d 490, 496 (Tex. Crim.
green Jack Theotrice Clark, Jr. v. State (2015)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Farris v. State, 819 S.W.2d 490, 496 (Tex.Crim.App.1990), overruled on other grounds by Riley v. State, 889 S.W.2d 290, 298 (Tex.Crim.App.1993).
green Kenneth Milo Littlebrave, Jr. v. State of Texas (2012)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Farris v. State, 819 S.W.2d 490, 495 (Tex. Crim.
green Klent Aaron Burnside v. State of Texas (2012)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Farris v. State, 819 S.W.2d 490, 495 (Tex. Crim.
green Gregory Lopez v. State (2012)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
App. 2011); Farris v. State, 819 S.W.2d 490, 495 (Tex. Crim.
green Joe Luther Willis v. State of Texas (2012)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Farris v. State, 819 S.W.2d 490, 495 (Tex. Crim.
green Christopher Andrew Miller v. State (2011)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Farris v. State, 819 S.W.2d 490, 495 (Tex. Crim.
green Alandus Weaver v. State (2011)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
App. 1992) (concluding that appellant’s confession that he was at scene, combined with other suspicious factors, was sufficient to corroborate accomplice testimony); Farris v. State, 819 S.W.2d 490, 495 (Tex. Crim.
noting that a defendant’s confession that is not dependent upon accomplice testimony for proof may be sufficient to corroborate accomplice testimony
green Alandus Weaver v. State (2011)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
App. 1992) (concluding that appellant’s confession that he was at scene, combined with other suspicious factors, was sufficient to corroborate accomplice testimony); Farris v. State , 819 S.W.2d 490, 495 (Tex. Crim.
noting that a defendant’s confession that is not dependent upon accomplice testimony for proof may be sufficient to corroborate accomplice testimony
green Martinez, Ex Parte Christina (2011)
Rule Authority · Tex. Crim. App.
Farris v. State , 819 S.W.2d 490, 495 (Tex. Crim.
green Martinez, Ex Parte Christina (2011)
Rule Authority · Tex. Crim. App.
Farris v. State, 819 S.W.2d 490, 495 (Tex. Crim.
green Ex Parte Martinez (2011)
Rule Authority · Tex. Crim. App.
Farris v. State, 819 S.W.2d 490, 495 (Tex.Crim.App.1990). 5 .
green Terrill Cruz v. State (2010)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Because the record reflects that Appellant's confession was voluntary; see Zuliani v. State, 903 S.W.2d 812, 825 (Tex.App.--Austin 1995, pet. ref'd), and proof of the confession does not depend on accomplice testimony; Thompson v. State, 54 S.W.3d 88, 94 (Tex.App.--Tyler 2000, pet. ref'd) (citing Farris v. State, 819 S.W.2d 490, 495 (Tex.Crim.App. 1990)), Appellant's incriminating statement may be used to corroborate Granados's accomplice testimony.
green Terrill Cruz v. State (2010)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Because the record reflects that Appellant's confession was voluntary; see Zuliani v. State , 903 S.W.2d 812, 825 (Tex.App.--Austin 1995, pet. ref'd), and proof of the confession does not depend on accomplice testimony; Thompson v. State , 54 S.W.3d 88, 94 (Tex.App.--Tyler 2000, pet. ref'd) (citing Farris v. State , 819 S.W.2d 490, 495 (Tex.Crim.App. 1990)), Appellant's incriminating statement may be used to corroborate Granados's accomplice testimony.
green Terrill Cruz v. State (2010)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Because the record reflects that Appellant's confession was voluntary; see Zuliani v. State, 903 S.W.2d 812, 825 (Tex.App.--Austin 1995, pet. ref'd), and proof of the confession does not depend on accomplice testimony; Thompson v. State, 54 S.W.3d 88, 94 (Tex.App.--Tyler 2000, pet. ref'd) (citing Farris v. State, 819 S.W.2d 490, 495 (Tex.Crim.App. 1990)), Appellant's incriminating statement may be used to corroborate Granados's accomplice testimony.
green Joey Dale Stone v. State (2009)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Having found Appellant’s statement was voluntary; Zuliani v. State , 903 S.W.2d 812, 825 (Tex.App.–Austin 1995, pet. ref’d), and proof of the statement does not depend on accomplice testimony; Thompson v. State , 54 S.W.3d 88, 94 (Tex.App.–Tyler 2000, pet. ref’d) (citing Farris v. State, 819 S.W.2d 490, 495 (Tex.Crim.App. 1990)), his confession may be used to corroborate Jimmie Don’s and Bobbie’s accomplices’ testimony.
green Anthony David Okunno v. State (2008)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Id. at 94 (citing Farris v. State , 819 S.W.2d 490, 495 (Tex. Crim.
green Tommie Loyd Prater v. State (2008)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Farris v. State , 819 S.W.2d 490, 495 (Tex. Crim.
green Johnny Lee Hurd v. State (2007)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Farris v. State , 819 S.W.2d 490, 469 (Tex. Crim.
green Perry v. State (2007)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Farris v. State, 819 S.W.2d 490, 495 (Tex.Crim.App.1990), overruled on other grounds by Riley v. State, 889 S.W.2d 290, 301 (Tex.Crim.App.1994).
green Terrell Deshaun Perry v. State (2007)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Farris v. State , 819 S.W.2d 490, 495 (Tex. Crim.
green Steven Jones v. State (2006)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Farris v. State, 819 S.W.2d 490, 496 (Tex. Crim.
green Steven Jones v. State (2006)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Farris v. State , 819 S.W.2d 490, 496 (Tex. Crim.
green Jones v. State (2006)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Farris v. State, 819 S.W.2d 490, 496 (Tex.Crim.App.1990), overruled on other grounds by Riley v. State, 889 S.W.2d 290, 301 (Tex.Crim.App.1993) (op. on reh’g); Martin v. State, 541 S.W.2d 605, 606-07 (Tex.Crim.App.1976); see Dingier v. State, 705 S.W.2d 144, 145 (Tex.Crim.App.1984) (“rule of ‘idem sonans’ is that absolute accuracy in spelling a name is not required”; if misspelled name sounds “practically identical with the correct name,” misspelling sufficiently identifies …
green Nathan Rios v. State (2005)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Because the record reflects that Appellant's confession was voluntary; see Zuliani v. State , 903 S.W.2d 812, 825 (Tex.App.--Austin 1995, pet. ref'd), and proof of the confession does not depend on accomplice testimony; Thompson v. State , 54 S.W.3d 88, 94 (Tex.App.--Tyler 2000, pet. ref'd) (citing Farris v. State , 819 S.W.2d 490, 495 (Tex.Crim.App. 1990)), Appellant's incriminating statement may be used to corroborate Granados's accomplice testimony.
green Patrick Dwight Figures v. State (2005)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Farris v. State , 819 S.W.2d 490, 496 (Tex. Crim.
green Reynaldo Sanchez v. State (2004)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Farris v. State , 819 S.W.2d 490, 496 (Tex.Crim.App. 1990), overruled on other grounds, Riley v. State , 889 S.W.2d 290 (Tex.Crim.App. 1994).
green Reynaldo Sanchez v. State (2004)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Farris v. State , 819 S.W.2d 490, 496 (Tex.Crim.App. 1990), overruled on other grounds, Riley v. State , 889 S.W.2d 290 (Tex.Crim.App. 1994).
green Reynaldo Sanchez v. State (2004)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Farris v. State, 819 S.W.2d 490, 496 (Tex.Crim.App. 1990), overruled on other grounds, Riley v. State, 889 S.W.2d 290 (Tex.Crim.App. 1994).
green Wilson, Darrell Vincent v. State (2003)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Farris v. State , 819 S.W.2d 490, 495 (Tex. Crim .
green David Joseph Coleman v. State (2003)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
The indictment alleged the transferee’s name is “Joseph Rideaux.” On voir dire, the witness testified that he spells his name “Redeau.” Before the jury, he testified that two of his brothers spell their common surname in the manner that it appears on the indictment, and that name is pronounced the same as “Redeau.” “A variance between the allegation and proof of a name will not impugn the validity of a judgment of conviction so long as the names sound alike or the attentive …
green Newkirk, Suzanne v. State (2003)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Farris v. State , 819 S.W.2d 490, 495 (Tex. Crim.
green House v. State (2003)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Farris v. State, 819 S.W.2d 490, 495 (Tex.Crim.App.1990), overruled on other grounds by Riley v. State, 889 S.W.2d 290 (Tex.Crim.App.1993).
green House, Robert Earl v. State (2003)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Farris v. State , 819 S.W.2d 490, 495 (Tex. Crim.
green Samuel Dean Stitt v. State (2003)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Farris v. State , 819 S.W.2d 490, 496 (Tex. Crim.
green Stitt v. State (2003)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Farris v. State, 819 S.W.2d 490, 496 (Tex.Crim.App.1990), overruled on other grounds, Riley v. State, 889 S.W.2d 290, 301 (Tex.Crim.App.1993) (op. on reh’g).
green Fields, Andre Keith v. State (2002)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Farris v. State , 819 S.W.2d 490, 495 (Tex. Crim.
green Evans, Eric AKA Kendrick Simmons v. State (2002)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Farris v. State , 819 S.W.2d 490, 496 (Tex. Crim .
green Marshall, Shannon Dean v. State (2002)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Farris v. State , 819 S.W.2d 490, 496 (Tex. Crim App. 1990).
green Madria, DuWayne v. State (2002)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Farris v. State , 819 S.W.2d 490, 495 (Tex. Crim.
quoting Jackson, 443 U.S. at 326