How cited: Freeman Industries LLC v. Eastman Chemical Co. · Go Syfert

Freeman Industries LLC v. Eastman Chemical Co. (2006)

green · 25 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 14 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
All Green 14
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
201020182026
Sort: By significance · Most recent
green Timothy J. Pagliara v. Marlene Moses (2022)
Rule Authority · Tenn. Ct. App.
Co., 227 S.W.3d 561, 567 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006) (citing Earls v. Earls, No. M1999-00035-COA-R3-CV, 2001 WL 504905 , at *3 (Tenn. Ct. App. May 14, 2001)).
citing Earls v. Earls, No. M1999-00035-COA-R3-CV, 2001 WL 504905 , at *3 (Tenn. Ct. App. May 14, 2001)
green Kimberly Medders v. Landon Newby (2021)
Rule Authority
Co., 227 S.W.3d 561, 565 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006)); March v. Levine, 115 S.W.3d 892, 908 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003).
green Ezra Maize v. Friendship Community Church Inc (2020)
Rule Authority · Tenn. Ct. App.
Co., 227 S.W.3d 561, 566 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006) (citing Branch v. Warren, 527 S.W.2d 89 (Tenn. 1975); Tennessee Dept. of Mental Health & Mental Retardation v. Hughes, 531 S.W.2d 299 (Tenn. 1975); Matus v. Metro.
citing Branch v. Warren, 527 S.W.2d 89 (Tenn. 1975); Tennessee Dept. of Mental Health & Mental Retardation v. Hughes, 531 S.W.2d 299 (Tenn. 1975); Matus v. Metro. Gov't of Nashville, 128 S.W.3d 653 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003
green Stephanie Keller v. Estate of Edward Stephen McRedmond (2020)
Rule Authority · Tenn. Ct. App.
Co., 227 S.W.3d 561, 568 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006).
green Carl Allen v. Joseph S. Ozment (2018)
Rule Authority · Tenn. Ct. App.
Co., 227 S.W.3d 561, 565 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006) (citing Eldridge v. Eldridge, 42 S.W.3d 82, 85 (Tenn.2001); Merriman v. Smith, 599 S.W.2d 548, 559 (Tenn. Ct. App. -7- 1979)) (“[T]he trial court has the discretion to grant or deny a motion to amend, and this court will reverse the decision only for an abuse of discretion. . . .
citing Eldridge v. Eldridge, 42 S.W.3d 82, 85 (Tenn.2001); Merriman v. Smith, 599 S.W.2d 548, 559 (Tenn. Ct. App. -7- 1979)
green In Re: Last Will and Testament of Mary Theresse Erde (2017)
Rule Authority · Tenn. Ct. App.
Co., 227 S.W.3d 561, 565 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006) (applying the abuse of discretion standard to Rule 15.01 motions).
applying the abuse of discretion standard to Rule 15.01 motions
green Stanley Creekmore, Administrator For The Estate Of Alma B. Long v. Jason S. Hackler (2016)
Rule Authority · Tenn. Ct. App.
Co., 227 S.W.3d 561, 565 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006).
green Randall E. Pearson, M.D. v. Paul Koczera (2016)
Rule Authority · Tenn. Ct. App.
Co., 227 S.W.3d 561, 567 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006)).
green City of Oak Ridge v. Joseph J. Levitt, Jr. (2015)
Rule Authority · Tenn. Ct. App.
Co., 227 S.W.3d 561, 565 (Tenn.Ct.App. 2006).
green James Michael Adler v. City of Johnson City (2015)
Rule Authority · Tenn. Ct. App.
The trial court‟s scheduling order, entered over four years later, clearly provided the Adlers notice that “[a]ny motion to amend pleadings [must] be filed by May 15, 2012,” and that “[n]o amendments shall be allowed after May 15, 2012.” Despite all this, the Adlers waited until July 2, 2012 ‒ almost six years after their alleged injury ‒ to file their motion to amend, an amendment clearly barred by the statute of limitations. “[T]he trial court has the discretion to grant o…
green Dietrich Hill v. City of Memphis (2014)
Rule Authority · Tenn. Ct. App.
Co., 227 S.W.3d 561, 566-67 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006) (quoting Richland Country Club, Inc. v. CRC Equities, Inc., 832 S.W.2d 554, 559 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1991)).
quoting Richland Country Club, Inc. v. CRC Equities, Inc., 832 S.W.2d 554, 559 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1991)
green David R. Seaton v. Wise Properties-TN, LLC (2014)
Rule Authority · Tenn. Ct. App.
Co., 227 S.W.3d 561, 567 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006).
green In Re: Anna L. J. (2014)
Rule Authority · Tenn. Ct. App.
Co., 227 S.W.3d 561, 565 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006).
green Cooper v. Tabb (2010)
Rule Authority · Tenn. Ct. App.
Co., 227 S.W.3d 561, 567 (Tenn.Ct.App.2006) (noting that, once a case is remanded and jurisdiction is reinvested in the trial court after an appeal, "the case stands in the same posture it did before the appeal except insofar as the trial court’s judgment has been changed or modified”).