How cited: Dudley v. State · Go Syfert

Dudley v. State (1981)

green · 15 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 6 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
All Green 6
Sort: By significance · Most recent
green Cliff Berry, Inc. v. State (2012)
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Mathis v. State, 973 So.2d 1153, 1157 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (finding that a self-defense instruction was required based on facts including the defendant’s testimony that the victim was the aggressor and he was simply defending himself); Chavers v. State, 901 So.2d 409, 411 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (holding the lower court erred in failing to give the requested instruction in a self-defense case where the defendant testified that he suffered from a nervous condition and that he reac…
concluding that, although the defendant did not testify, because the testimony of the defendant’s business associate established sufficient evidence of the defendant’s good faith, the defendant was enti- tied to a jury instruction regarding his good faith defense
green Boswell v. State (1992)
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
As the court said in Dudley v. State, 405 So.2d 304, 305 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981): If the defendant asserts a valid legal defense and there is evidence presented to support the defense then the trial court is obligated to instruct the jury as to such defense upon request by the defendant.
green Robinson v. State (1991)
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
As the court stated in Dudley v. State, 405 So.2d 304, 305-06 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), the accomplice testimony instruction is intended to be used when the state presents the testimony of an accomplice whose motivation for testifying against his alleged colleague and cooperating with the state may be substantially influenced by his own self-interest.
green Aget v. State (1984)
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
In Dudley v. State, 405 So.2d 304, 305, 306 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), the court stated the general rule regarding the use of the accomplice testimony instruction: This instruction is intended to be used when the state presents the testimony of an accomplice whose motivation for testifying against his alleged colleague and cooperating with the state may be substantially influenced by his own self-interest.
green Morrison v. State (1989)
Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Dudley v. State, 405 So.2d 304 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).
green Gilbert v. State (1986)
Cited (see also) · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see also
See also Dudley v. State, 405 So.2d 304 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), which requires a defense to be legally cognizable.