North Slope Borough v. Andrus (1979)
green
· 60 citation events
across 6 courts.
Showing the 10 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198020032026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
yellow
North Slope Borough v. Andrus (1980)
But cf. North Slope Borough, 486 F.Supp. at 354-55.
yellow
North Slope Borough v. Cecil D. Andrus, Secretary of the Department of the Interior Atlantic Richfield Compan… (1980)
But cf. North Slope Borough, 486 F.Supp. at 354-55.
green
Nuiqsut Trilateral, Inc. v. Doug Burgum, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, et al. (2026)
Corp., 826 F. App'x 610 , 614 (9th Cir. 2020) (citation omitted). 54 Docket 21 at 19-20 (citing N. Slope Borough v. Andrus, 486 F. Supp. 326, 331 (D.D.C. 1979)). 55 See Docket 12-3. substantial uncertainty and confusion regarding competing property interests that would affect not only Plaintiff, but also each of the lessees of those tracts, none of whom are parties to this litigation.56 Requiring Plaintiff to assert its competing property interest in the ROW tracts by seekin…
green
Oceana v. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (2014)
Courts have recognized that “NEPA does not require that complete information about the environmental impact of a pro *160 ject be obtained before a project is undertaken.” N. Slope Borough v. Andrus, 486 F.Supp. 326, 330 (D.D.C.1979); see also Seattle Audubon Soc’y v. Lyons, 871 F.Supp. 1291, 1318 (W.D.Wash.1994), aff'd, 80 F.3d 1401 (9th Cir.1996) (“It is not required ... that action be deferred until all studies have been done that might be done.”).
green
Wilderness Society v. Babbitt (2009)
However, the court noted -12- that the district court was correct in stating that “‘[t]he decision of how much detail to include is one for the agency itself,’ guided by a ‘rule of reason.’” Id. (quoting North Slope Borough v. Andrus, 486 F. Supp. 326, 345 (D.D.C. 1979)).
Opp’n at 17 (citing Fund For Animals v. Turner, 1991 WL 206232 at *1 (D.D.C.1991); North Slope Borough v. Andrus, 486 F.Supp. 326, 329-332 (D.D.C.1979) (both applying the traditional four-part balancing test in an ESA case)).
green
Association Concerned About Tomorrow, Inc. v. Dole (1985)
North Slope Borough v. Andrus, 486 F.Supp. 326, 331 (D.D.C.1979).
green
North Slope Borough v. Andrus (1981)
North Slope Borough v. Andrus, 486 F.Supp. 326, 329-330 (D.D.C.1979). 3 .
green
Segar v. Civiletti (1981)
See North Slope Borough v. Andrus, 486 F.Supp. 326, 330-331 (D.D.C.1979).
green
Hogan v. Brown (1981)
See, also, North Slope Borough v. Andrus, supra, at 601-603 rev’d, 486 F.Supp. 326 (D.D.C.1979).