How cited: Sly v. First Nat. Bank of Scottsboro · Go Syfert

Sly v. First Nat. Bank of Scottsboro (1980)

green · 16 citation events across 11 courts. Showing the 8 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
green Williams v. Janson (2022)
Rule Authority · Va.
Bank of Scottsboro, 387 So. 2d 198, 200 (Ala. 1980) (statement that property would be sold to “the ‘highest, best and last bidder’ . . . cannot reasonably be construed to mean the defendant was obligated to sell under any circumstance”). “[S]uch statements are usually merely preliminary negotiation, not intended and not reasonably, understood to be intended to affect legal relations.” 1 Timothy Murray, Corbin on Contracts § 4.14 (rev. ed. 2017).6 Furthermore, the Court canno…
statement that property would be sold to “the ‘highest, best and last bidder’ . . . cannot reasonably be construed to mean the defendant was obligated to sell under any circumstance”
Rule Authority · Ala. Civ. App.
"There is no breach of contract unless there was previously an offer and acceptance." Sly v. First Nat'l Bank of Scottsboro, 387 So.2d 198, 200 (Ala.1980) (emphasis added).
Rule Authority · N.D. Ga.
Bank of Scottsboro, 387 So.2d 198, 200 (Ala.1980) (finding that the parties had not established a contract because the defendant had pre-’ sented the item for sale with reserve — thereby allowing the defendant “to withdraw the goods or to accept or reject any bid”- — and was thus entitled to reject the plaintiffs high bid even after the auction was completed).
Cited · 11th Cir. · signal: see
See Sly v. First National Bank, 387 So.2d 198 (Ala. 1980); Nobility Homes, Inc. v. Ballentine, 386 So.2d 727, 730 (Ala. 1980); Marshall v. Crocker, 387 So.2d 176 (Ala.1980).
Cited · Ill. App. Ct. · signal: see
See Sly v. First National Bank of Scottsboro, 387 So. 2d 198, 200 (Ala. 1980) (holding that a potential buyer unreasonably relied on the seller’s declaration that the property would sell to the “highest, best and last bidder”). ¶ 40 Further lessening any potential reliance Thompson could have had is Tunney’s subsequent email, which spoke in much less concrete language, and contemporaneous statements made by Tunney that were reported in a news article.
holding that a potential buyer unreasonably relied on the seller’s declaration that the property would sell to the “highest, best and last bidder”
Cited (see also) · Conn. · signal: see also
Appx. 124 , 126 (2d Cir. 2018) ; id., at 125 (applying New York's sale by auction statute that contains language identical to § 42a-2-328 ); see also, e.g., Sly v. First National Bank of Scottsboro , 387 So.2d 198 , 200 (Ala. 1980) (applying identical language and concluding that seller's use of phrase " 'highest, best and last bidder' " did not transform auction into auction without reserve).
applying identical language and concluding that seller's use of phrase " 'highest, best and last bidder' " did not transform auction into auction without reserve
Cited (see also) · Tex. App. · signal: see also
See Drew v. John Deere Co. of Syracuse, 19 A.D.2d 308 , 241 N.Y.S.2d 267, 270 (1963); see also Sly v. First Nat’l Bank of Scottsboro, 387 So.2d 198, 200 (Ala.1980).
green Roney v. Ray (1983)
Cited · Ala. · signal: see
See Sly v. First National Bank of Scottsboro , 387 So.2d 198 (Ala. 1980).