How cited: Koviak v. Union Electric Company · Go Syfert

Koviak v. Union Electric Company (1969)

green · 16 citation events across 4 courts. Showing the 7 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
All Green 7
Sort: By significance · Most recent
green Springs v. Cantrell (1976)
Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
The following language appears in Neil v. Independent Realty Co., 317 Mo. 1235 , 298 S.W. 363, 366 (1927): “If a highway be laid out through the land of A. and he afterwards conveys the land upon one side of the highway to B. and the land upon the other to C., without reservation, they become the owners of the fee in the soil of the highway equally, each owning to the center.” See also Brown v. Weare, 152 S.W.2d 649 (quoted in Footnote 3) and Koviak v. Union Electric Co., 44…
green Mark Rowland and Brenda Rowland v. Keith A. Quevreaux, Trustee of the Keith A. Quevreaux Revocable Trust U/T/… (2021)
Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.
Co., 442 S.W.2d 934, 939 (Mo. 1969) (landowner could not defeat another's title by conveying property she did not own).
landowner could not defeat another's title by conveying property she did not own
green Foster v. Village of Brownington (2004)
Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.
Point Two Appellants’ point two claims that the trial court erred because its judgment was against the weight of the evidence in that “Koviak v. Union Electric Company, 442 S.W.2d 934, 937 (Mo.1969) should have been the primary ruling factor in the court’s judgment regarding plaintiffs (sic) count II.” Koviak states what the court terms a “general rule”: Where an easement only is received by a railroad company, the same rule should apply to the lands used for railroad purpos…
green Ruddick v. Bryan (1999)
Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.
Co., 442 S.W.2d 934, 939 (Mo.1969)(It was not necessary that there be evidence of the intention to convey.
green Boyles v. Missouri Friends of the Wabash Trace Nature Trail, Inc. (1998)
Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.
Co., 442 S.W.2d 934, 938-939 (Mo.1969); City of Columbia v. Baurichter, 729 S.W.2d 475, 481 (Mo.App.
green Main Street Feeds, Inc. v. Hall (1998)
Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.
Co., 442 S.W.2d 934, 939 (Mo. 1969).
green Wheeling Stamping Co. v. Warwood Land Co. (1991)
Rule Authority · W. Va.
Co., 442 S.W.2d 934, 937 (Mo.1969) (quoting Brown v. Weare, 348 Mo. 135, 143 , 152 S.W.2d 649, 654 (1941)), that “[w]here an easement only is received by a railroad company, the same rule should apply to the ‘lands used for railroad purposes and later abandoned as applies to public highways.’ ” That rule, in Missouri as well as West Virginia, is that the property reverts to the abutting landowners.