How cited: Barrie v. United States · Go Syfert

Barrie v. United States (2005)

green · 12 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 6 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Rule Authority · D.C. · 3 citations in this opinion
When determining if an informant’s tip supplied law enforcement with probable cause, “a judicial officer should consider the totality of the circumstances, taking into account ‘an informant’s veracity, reliability, and basis of knowledge.’ ” Barrie v. United States, 887 A.2d 29, 31 (D.C.2005) (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 230-31 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983)).
Quote Authority · D.C. · signal: accord · 2 citations in this opinion
See Goldston v. United States, 562 A.2d 96, 99 (D.C.1989) (“an informant’s history of supplying prior productive information is a most important guide to establishing reliability and credibility”); accord, e.g., Barrie, 887 A.2d at 32 (“the fact that the informant was well-known to the police, and thus could be held to account were his information found to be willfully false, gives his report added weight”).
“the fact that the informant was well-known to the police, and thus could be held to account were his information found to be willfully false, gives his report added weight”
Rule Authority · D.C.
The Court concluded in its “narrow” holding — which does “not disturb the application of Smith and Miller or . . . address other business records that might incidentally reveal location information” — that the historical CSLI at issue was governed by (…continued) States, 26 A.3d 745, 751 (D.C. 2011) (quoting Barrie v. United States, 887 A.2d 29, 31 (D.C. 2005)).
Quote Authority · D.C. · signal: see
See Barrie v. United States, 887 A.2d 29, 32 (D.C. 2005) (“D.C.
“D.C. Code § 5-117.05 makes it a crime to give false information to the police knowing that information to be false.”
Rule Authority · D.C.
In reviewing the trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress, this court “must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing party.” Barrie v. United States, 887 A.2d 29, 31 (D.C.2005) (citations omitted).
Cited (see also) · D.C. · signal: see also
Furthermore, “[although an anonymous tip alone seldom demonstrates the informant’s basis of knowledge or veracity, there are situations in which an anonymous tip, suitably corroborated, exhibits sufficient indicia of reliability to provide reasonable suspicion to make the investigatory stop.” Jefferson v. United States, 776 A.2d 576, 579 (D.C.2001) (quoting Alabama v. White, 496 U.S. 325, 329 , 110 S.Ct. 2412 , 110 L.Ed.2d 301 (1990) and J.L., supra, 529 U.S. at 270, 120 S.C…