How cited: Pettie v. State · Go Syfert

Pettie v. State (1989)

green · 44 citation events across 5 courts. Showing the 5 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199020082026
green Snyder v. State (2000)
Rule Authority · Md. · 3 citations in this opinion
Citing Bedford v. State, 317 Md. 659, 667-68 , 566 A.2d 111, 115 (1989), and Pettie v. State, 316 Md. 509, 519-20 , 560 A.2d 577, 581-82 (1989), the petitioner argues that, because, as it is in this case, the failure to inquire is so ambiguous and is subject to so many interpretations, evidence of the lack of inquiry cannot be probative of consciousness of guilt and, therefore, simply is irrelevant.
green State v. Mann (1993)
Rule Authority · N.J. · signal: cf. · 3 citations in this opinion
Cf. Pettie v. State, 316 Md. 509 , 560 A.2d 577, 582 (1989) (finding facts insufficient to support conclusion that defendant tried to kill himself and that attempt was in response to criminal conduct but not reaching ultimate question of whether evidence of attempted suicide is admissible as analogous to flight).
finding facts insufficient to support conclusion that defendant tried to kill himself and that attempt was in response to criminal conduct but not reaching ultimate question of whether evidence of attempted suicide is admissible as analogous to flight
green Devincentz v. State (2018)
Quote Authority · Md. · 2 citations in this opinion
Maryland Rule 5-616(b)(3) permits impeachment by "[e]xtrinsic evidence of bias, prejudice, interest, or other motive to testify falsely ... whether or not the witness has been examined about the impeaching fact and has failed to admit it." See Pettie v. State , 316 Md. 509 , 514, 560 A.2d 577 (1989) ("[I]t is well established that the bias, hostility[,] or motives of a witness are relevant and are admissible for purposes of impeachment.").
"[I]t is well established that the bias, hostility[,] or motives of a witness are relevant and are admissible for purposes of impeachment."
green Ebb v. State (1996)
Rule Authority · Md.
Pettie v. State, 316 Md. 509, 512-18 [ 560 A.2d 577 ] (1989); Brown v. State, 74 Md.App. 414, 415-22 [ 538 A.2d 317 ] (1988).
green Redditt v. State (1995)
Rule Authority · Md.
In Pettie v. State, 316 Md. 509, 513-18 , 560 A.2d 577, 579-81 (1989), where the impeaching statement was a threat made to the witness by a third party, we held that extrinsic evidence of the statement was directly admissible, and no foundation was necessary.