How cited: Scott v. State · Go Syfert

Scott v. State (2010)

green · 50 citation events across 2 courts. Showing the 12 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2012 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
201220192026
green Cheeks v. State (2013)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 5 citations in this opinion
Reynolds v. State, 285 Ga. 70, 71 ( 673 SE2d 854 ) (2009); Scott v. State, 305 Ga. App. 710, 716 (2) (a) ( 700 SE2d 694 ) (2010); Johnson v. State, 293 Ga. App. 728, 730 ( 667 SE2d 637 ) (2008).
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 4 citations in this opinion
Reynolds v. State, 285 Ga. 70, 71 ( 673 SE2d 854 ) (2009); 2 Scott v. State, 305 Ga. App. 710, 716 (2) (a) ( 700 SE2d 694 ) (2010); Johnson v. State, 293 Ga. App. 728, 730 ( 667 SE2d 637 ) (2008).
green Gregory Dumas v. State (2016)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 3 citations in this opinion
See Reynolds v. State, 285 Ga. 70, 71 ( 673 SE2d 854 ) (2009); Mallory v. State, 261 Ga. 625, 630 (5) ( 409 SE2d 839 ) (1991), overruled on other grounds recognized in Clark v. State, 271 Ga. 6, 10 (5) ( 515 SE2d 155 ) (1999); Scott v. State, 305 Ga. App. 710, 716 (2) (a) ( 700 SE2d 694 ) (2010); Johnson v. State, 293 Ga. App. 728, 730 ( 667 SE2d 637 ) (2008).
green Dumas v. State (2016)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 3 citations in this opinion
See Reynolds v. State, 285 Ga. 70, 71 ( 673 SE2d 854 ) (2009); Mallory v. State, 261 Ga. 625, 630 (5) ( 409 SE2d 839 ) (1991), overruled on other grounds recognized in Clark v. State, 271 Ga. 6, 10 (5) ( 515 SE2d 155 ) (1999); Scott v. State, 305 Ga. App. 710, 716 (2) (a) ( 700 SE2d 694 ) (2010); Johnson v. State, 293 Ga. App. 728, 730 ( 667 SE2d 637 ) (2008).
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 3 citations in this opinion
See, e.g., Thomas v. State, 284 Ga. 647, 649 (3) (a) ( 670 SE2d 421 ) (2008); Lampley v. State, 284 Ga. 37, 38-39 (2) (b) ( 663 SE2d 184 ) (2008); Scott v. State, 305 Ga. App. 710, 716 (2) (a) ( 700 SE2d 694 ) (2010); Reynolds v. State, 300 Ga. App. 353 -354 (2) ( 685 SE2d 346 ) (2009). “[T]rial counsel’s testimony established that his failure to object to these improper arguments [and testimony] arose not from strategy, but from his mistaken belief that they were not object…
green State v. Moore (2012)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 3 citations in this opinion
See, e.g., Thomas v. State, 284 Ga. 647, 649 (3) (a) ( 670 SE2d 421 ) (2008); Lampley v. State, 284 Ga. 37, 38-39 (2) (b) ( 663 SE2d 184 ) (2008); Scott v. State, 305 Ga. App. 710, 716 (2) (a) ( 700 SE2d 694 ) (2010); Reynolds v. State, 300 Ga. App. 353 -354 (2) ( 685 SE2d 346 ) (2009). [T]rial counsel’s testimony established that his failure to object to these improper arguments [and testimony] arose not from strategy, but from his mistaken belief that they were not objecti…
Quote Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Scott v. State, 305 Ga. App. 710, 716-717 (2) (a) ( 700 SE2d 694 ) (2010) (“In the context of an ineffective assistance claim, prejudice is shown by demonstrating that a reasonable probability exists that the outcome of the case would have been different but for the deficient performance of counsel.”) (citation and punctuation omitted); Barker, 277 Ga. App. 84, 87 (3).
“In the context of an ineffective assistance claim, prejudice is shown by demonstrating that a reasonable probability exists that the outcome of the case would have been different but for the deficient performance of counsel.”
green Williams v. State (2019)
Rule Authority · Ga.
In light of the strength of the evidence, we conclude that no prejudice resulted from trial counsel’s failure to raise a Mallory objection to the prosecutor’s argument.9 Consequently, Williams has not shown ineffective assistance of counsel in this 9 See Wallace v. State, 272 Ga. 501, 504 (3) (a) ( 530 SE2d 721 ) (2000) (in light of the strength of the physical and circumstantial evidence identifying the appellant as the perpetrator of his wife’s murder, the appellant failed…
green Rush v. State (2014)
Rule Authority · Ga.
Although the complained of statement in this case is similar to one found to be an improper comment on a defendant’s right to remain silent in Scott v. State, 305 Ga. App. 710, 713 ( 700 SE2d 694 ) (2010), there the prosecutor’s statement, which included additional language asking why he (Scott) failed to give the *391 police a statement if he “hadn’t done anything,” was clearly directed at the defendant’s failure to turn himself in after having been informed the police were…
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Courts must consider a number of factors “[w]hen determining whether the State’s unchallenged comments or questions about a defendant’s right to remain silent have prejudiced that defendant.” Scott v. State, 305 Ga. App. 710, 717 (2) (a) ( 700 SE2d 694 ) (2010).
green Shaburov v. State (2013)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Courts must consider a number of factors “[w]hen determining whether the State’s unchallenged comments or questions about a defendant’s right to remain silent have prejudiced that defendant.” Scott v. State, 305 Ga. App. 710, 717 (2) (a) ( 700 SE2d 694 ) (2010).
green Moses v. the State (2014)
Cited · Ga. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Scott v. State, 305 Ga. App. 710 ( 700 SE2d 694 ) (2010); Miller v. State, 228 Ga. App. 754 ( 492 SE2d 734 ) (1997); Geoffrion, supra. (iii) Closing argument.