How cited: Cinco Enterprises, Inc. v. Benso · Go Syfert

Cinco Enterprises, Inc. v. Benso (1994)

green · 33 citation events across 4 courts. Showing the 8 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199520102026
green Shaffer v. Jeffery (1996)
Rule Authority · Okla. · 2 citations in this opinion
Cinco Enterprises, Inc. v. Benso, 890 P.2d 866, 871 (OHa.1994); Indiana Nat.
Rule Authority · Okla.
Cinco Enterprises, Inc. v. Benso, 1994 OK 135 , 890 P.2d 866, 871 ("'The party moving for summary judgment has the burden to prove the facts material to its claim and to show the absence of any factual dispute of the facts material to the claim or defense ... {[a] fact is material if proof of that fact would have the effect of establishing or refuting one of the essential elements of a claim or defense."). .
green Beard v. Love (2007)
Rule Authority · Okla. Civ. App.
Cinco Enters., Inc. v. Benso, 1994 OK 135, ¶ 12 , 890 P.2d 866, 871 (the moving party has the burden of showing that it is entitled to judgment).
green Bowers v. Wimberly (1997)
Rule Authority · Okla.
Cinco Enterprises, Inc. v. Benso, 890 P.2d 866, 874 (Okla.1994), FDIC v. Moss, 831 P.2d 613 (Okla.1991).
Rule Authority · Okla. Civ. App.
Whether the parties reached an agreement is a “question of fact to be determined by a jury, unless a jury is waived and the matter is tried to the court.” Cinco Enterprises, Inc. v. Benso, 890 P.2d 866, 874 (Okla.1994).
Cited (see also) · Okla. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
See also Cinco Enterprises, Inc. v. Benso, 1994 Ok 135, 890 P.2d 866, 871 ; Indiana Nat.
Cited · W.D. Okla. · signal: see
See Cinco Enterprises, Inc. v. Benso, 890 P.2d 866, 874 (Okla. 1994) (“Whether the parties have reached an accord and satisfaction depends upon the circumstances in each case and must be ascertained from the parties’ intentions. … [T]he question of intention is a question of fact to be determined by a jury, unless a jury is waived and the matter is tried to the court.”); see also 15A STEVEN PLITT, et al., COUCH ON INSURANCE § 215:28 (3d ed., June 2023 update).
Cited (see also) · Okla. · signal: see also
See also Cinco Enterprises, Inc., v. Benso, 890 P.2d 866 (Okla.1994); Crockett v. McKenzie, 867 P.2d 463, 467 (Okla.1994).