How cited: Cluster 271663 · Go Syfert

Cluster 271663 (1966)

green · 33 citation events across 14 courts. Showing the 11 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
196619962026
Rule Authority · 6th Cir.
Marquardt Corp. v. Weber County, Utah, 360 F.2d 168, 172 (10th Cir.).
Rule Authority · 6th Cir.
Marquardt Corp. v. Weber County, Utah, 360 F.2d 168, 172 (10th Cir.).
Rule Authority · 10th Cir.
Marquardt Corp. v. Weber County, Utah, 360 F.2d 168, 171 (10th Cir. 1966). 5 .
Rule Authority · Utah · 6 citations in this opinion
Marquardt Corp. v. Weber County, 360 F.2d 168, 172 (10th Cir.1966).
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct. · 2 citations in this opinion
Thus it was held in Marquardt Corp. v. Weber County, 360 F.2d 168, 171 (10th Cir. 1966), that where the United States reimbursed certain contractors for taxes levied upon them by the State of Utah because it had agreed by contract to pay them a “cost-plus fixed fee” (including taxes), the United States, upon reimbursing the taxpayer pursuant to its contract, became the real party in interest with the right to assert the invalidity of the tax on the grounds of unconstitutiona…
Rule Authority · D. Nev.
Marquardt Corp. v. Weber County, 360 F.2d 168, 172 (10th Cir.1966) (citing Phillips, 361 U.S. at 385 , 80 S.Ct. at 480 ).
Rule Authority · Nev.
It is therefore just that upon reversal we should remand the case for a further hearing upon the issue of discrimination, inviting attention of the well established rule in the decisions of this Court, cited above, that mere errors of judgment do not support a claim of discrimination, but that there must be something more — something which in effect amounts to an intentional violation of the essential principle of practical uniformity. *85 These authorities have been followe…
Cited (see also) · 8th Cir. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
The court held that the United States had standing because " '[t]he action ... is essentially to establish the right of the [U.S.] and those with whom it deals to be relieved from an unconstitutionally discriminatory tax and to assert the constitutional immunity of the [U.S.] from taxation by the state.' " Nevada Tax Comm'n, 439 F.2d at 438 -439 (quoting United States v. Bureau of Revenue of New Mexico, 291 F.2d 677, 678-679 (10th Cir.1961); see also Marquardt Corp. v. Weber…
Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Marquardt Corp. v. Weber County, 10 Cir., 360 F.2d 168, 171 . .
Cited · W.D. Mo. · signal: see
United States v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 500 F.Supp. 729, 731 (E.D.Va.1980); see Marquardt Corp. v. Weber County, Utah, 360 F.2d 168, 171 (10th Cir.1966).
green Allen v. Tooele County (1968)
Cited · Utah · signal: see
See Thiokol Chemical Corp. v. Peterson, 15 Utah 2d 355 , 393 P.2d 391 , cited and relied on in Marquardt Corp. v. Weber County, 360 F.2d 168 (10th Cir. 966). .