How cited: Zameer v. City of Chicago · Go Syfert

Zameer v. City of Chicago (2013)

green · 60 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 11 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2013 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
201320192026
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
Zameer, 2013 IL App (1st) 120198, ¶¶ 5, 9 .
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
See 745 ILCS 10/3-102(a) (West 2016) (to be held liable for unsafe condition, municipality must have “actual or constructive notice of the existence of such a condition that is not reasonably safe in reasonably adequate time prior to an injury to have taken measures to remedy or protect against such condition.”); Zameer v. City of Chicago, 2013 IL App (1st) 120198, ¶ 19 (“The rule is that constructive notice is present where a defective condition exists for such a length of …
green Nguyen v. Lam (2018)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
Zameer, 2013 IL App (1st) 120198, ¶¶ 5, 14-15 .
Cited · Ill. App. Ct. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See id. ¶ 26 Under the Tort Immunity Act, “actual notice means notice of the condition only, not the unsafe nature of the condition.” Glass v. City of Chicago, 323 Ill.
Cited · Ill. App. Ct. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See id. ¶ 27 Under the Tort Immunity Act, “actual notice means notice of the condition only, not the unsafe nature of the condition.” Glass v. City of Chicago, 323 Ill.
Cited · Ill. App. Ct. · signal: see
See generally, Zameer v. City of Chicago, 2013 IL App (1st) 120198, ¶ 12 . ¶ 33 In this case, Macon County asserted that no evidence was offered to show that the flashing light on top of the stop sign was not operational at the time of the accident and that no facts or evidence showed that it had either actual or constructive notice of the conditions alleged in the plaintiff’s complaint.
Cited · Ill. App. Ct. · signal: see
See Zameer, 2013 IL App (1st) 120198, ¶ 18 . ¶ 22 Nor can we conclude that defendant had constructive notice of the displaced sidewalk slabs.
Cited (see also) · Ill. App. Ct. · signal: see also
App. 3d at 18, 19 (affirming summary judgment for City where plaintiff tripped on hole in sidewalk but there was “no evidence that the hole was plainly visible or that it was apparent for a long time prior to the injury”); see also Zameer, 2013 IL App (1st) 120198, ¶¶ 22, 24 (affirming summary judgment where plaintiff “has not presented evidence that would raise an issue of material fact as to the length of time the defect existed” and “failed to meet her burden to provide f…
Cited (see also) · Ill. App. Ct. · signal: see also
App. 3d at 18 (affirming summary judgment for City where plaintiff tripped on hole in sidewalk but there was "no evidence that the hole was plainly visible or that it was apparent for a long time prior to the injury"); see also Zameer, 2013 IL App (1st) 120198, ¶¶ 22-24 (affirming summary judgment where plaintiff "has not presented evidence that would raise an issue of material fact as to the length of time the defect existed" and "failed to meet her burden to provide facts …
Cited · Ill. App. Ct. · signal: see
See Zameer, 2013 IL App (1st) 120198, ¶ 14 ; Reed, 379 Ill. at 592 . ¶ 39 We conclude that Burns failed to meet his burden to provide facts showing that the City had constructive notice of the raised tiles.
Cited · Ill. App. Ct. · signal: see
See Zameer, 2013 IL App (1st) 120198, ¶ 14 ; Reed, 379 Ill. at 592 . ¶ 39 We conclude that Burns failed to meet his burden to provide facts showing that the City had constructive notice of the raised tiles.