Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,621 Securities and Exchange Commission v. James E. MacDonald Jr. (1984)
green
· 8 citation events
across 2 courts.
Showing the 7 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Computer Systems Engineering, Inc. v. Qantel Corporation, Computer Systems Engineering, Inc. v. Qantel Corpor… (1984)
Civ.P. 52(a); United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364, 396 , 68 S.Ct. 525, 542 , 92 L.Ed. 746 (1948); SEC v. MacDonald, 725 F.2d 9, 11 (1st Cir.1984); Marshall v. Commonwealth Aquarium, 611 F.2d 1, 2 (1st Cir.1979).
green
Bankr. L. Rep. P 72,300 in Re San Juan Hotel Corporation, Debtor. Hans Lopez-Stubbe v. Hector Rodriguez-Estra… (1988)
“A finding is clearly erroneous only if, after reviewing the entire record, the appellate court ‘is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.’ ” Scarpa v. Murphy, 806 F.2d 326, 328 (1st Cir.1986) (quoting Anderson v. Bessemer City, 470 U.S. 564, 573 , 105 S.Ct. 1504, 1511 , 84 L.Ed. 2d 518 (1985); United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364, 395 , 68 S.Ct. 525, 542 , 92 L.Ed. 746 (1948); SEC v. MacDonald, 725 F.2d 9, 11 (1st Ci…
green
Nicholas Apostol v. United States (1988)
“A finding is clearly erroneous only if, after reviewing the entire record, the appellate court ‘is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.’ ” Scarpa v. Murphy, 806 F.2d 326, 328 (1st Cir.1986) (quoting Anderson v. Bessemer City, 470 U.S. 564, 573 (1985); United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364, 395 , 68 S.Ct. 525, 541-42 , 92 L.Ed. 746 (1948); SEC v. MacDonald, 725 F.2d 9, 11 (1st Cir.1984)).
green
John Scarpa v. William Murphy (1986)
A finding is clearly erroneous only if, after reviewing the entire record, the appellate court “is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” Anderson v. Bessemer City, 470 U.S. 564, 573 , 105 S.Ct. 1504, 1511 , 84 L.Ed.2d 518 (1985); United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364, 395 , 68 S.Ct. 525, 541 , 92 L.Ed. 746 (1948); S.E.C. v. MacDonald, 725 F.2d 9, 11 (1st Cir.1984).
Cf. SEC v. MacDonald, 725 F.2d 9, 11 (1st Cir.1984) (per curiam) (district court *959 has wide latitude in evaluating the credibility of witnesses). 10 .
green
Juan Parrilla Lopez v. United States (1985)
Nor can we say that, in the absence of additional evidence, the court’s findings on liability and damages leave one “with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed”, Securities and Exchange Commission v. MacDonald, 725 F.2d 9, 11 (1st Cir.1984).
green
United States v. Michael Alan Mooney (2004)
See SEC v. MacDonald, 725 F.2d 9 , 11 n.2 (1st Cir. 1984) (per curiam) ("determinations of this type are more an art than a science, dependent upon a mix of factors for which there are no precise standards or guidelines").
per curiam