Jonathon Swink v. Andrew Saul (2019)
green
· 161 citation events
across 10 courts.
Showing the 50 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2019 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
201920222026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Cook v. Kijakazi (2022)
The SSA has established a five-step, sequential evaluation process for appraising whether a claimant is disabled and benefit-eligible. 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1520 , 416.920; Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 769 (8th Cir. 2019).
green
Poindexter v. Kijakazi (2022)
See Grindley v. Kijakazi, 9 F.4th 622, 631 (8th Cir. 2021); Adamczyk, 817 F. App’x at 291; Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 771 (8th Cir. 2019).
See Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 770 (8th Cir. 2019) (“‘[A]n ALJ is permitted to issue a decision without obtaining additional medical evidence so long as other evidence in the record provides a sufficient basis for the ALJ’s decision.’”) (quoting Anderson v. Shalala, 51 F.3d 777, 779 (8th Cir. 1995)).
“‘[A]n ALJ is permitted to issue a decision without obtaining additional medical evidence so long as other evidence in the record provides a sufficient basis for the ALJ’s decision.’”
green
Daniel H. v. Commissioner of Social Security (2026)
Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 769 (8th Cir. 2019).
green
Richard C. v. Commissioner of Social Security (2026)
Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 769 (8th Cir. 2019).
green
Brenda M. v. Commissioner of Social Security (2026)
Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 769 (8th Cir. 2019).
green
Natasha H. v. Commissioner of Social Security (2026)
Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 769 (8th Cir. 2019).
green
Tammy P. v. Commissioner of Social Security (2025)
Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 769 (8th Cir. 2019).
App’x 437, 438 (8th Cir. 2020) (citing Kirby, 500 F.3d at 707 ; Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 770-71 (8th Cir. 2019); Myers v. Colvin, 721 F.3d 521, 527 (8th Cir. 2013); Perks v. Astrue, 687 F.3d 1086, 1092 (8th Cir. 2012)).
green
Smith v. Social Security Administration (2025)
“An ALJ is permitted to issue a decision without obtaining additional medical evidence so long as other evidence in the record provides a sufficient basis for the ALJ’s decision.” Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 770 (8th Cir. 2019) (cleaned up).
cleaned up
green
Banks v. Dudek (2025)
Conclusion “A claimant bears the burden of establishing his RFC.” Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 770 (8th Cir. 2019).
green
Walz v. Dudek (2025)
Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 770 (8th Cir. 2019); see also Kamann v. Colvin, 721 F.3d 945, 950 (8th Cir. 2013) (stating that an ALJ may make a decision without obtaining additional medical evidence so long as other evidence in record provides sufficient basis for the decision); 20 C.F.R. § 404 .1519a(b) (“We may purchase a consultative examination to try to resolve an inconsistency in the evidence, or when the evidence as a whole is insufficient to allow us to make a determi…
green
Erickson v. Commissioner of Social Security (2025)
Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 769 (8th Cir. 2019).
green
Hlubek v. Social Security Administration (2025)
To determine whether a claimant has a disability, the Commissioner follows a five- step sequential evaluation process.5 Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 769 (8th Cir. 2019).
green
Dillavou v. Commissioner of Social Security (2025)
Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 769 (8th Cir. 2019).
green
Cook v. Commissioner of Social Security (2025)
Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 769 (8th Cir. 2019).
green
Hartsough v. O'Malley (2024)
Mo. Dec. 9, 2021) (citing Swing v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 770 (8th Cir. 2019)).
green
Meyer v. O'Malley (2024)
See Renstrom, 680 F.3d at 1067 (“Because the ALJ gave good reasons for discounting [claimant’s] credibility, we defer to the ALJ’s credibility findings.”); Eichelberger v. Barnhart, 390 F.3d 584, 590 (8th Cir. 2004) (“We will not substitute our opinion for that of the ALJ, who is in a better position to assess credibility.”).2 Conclusion “A claimant bears the burden of establishing his RFC.” Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 770 (8th Cir. 2019).
green
Bohannon v. O'Malley (2024)
“Because a claimant's RFC is a medical question, an ALJ's assessment of it must be supported by some medical evidence of the claimant's ability to function in the workplace.” Hensley v. Colvin, 829 F.3d 926, 932 (8th Cir. 2016) (quoting Cox v. Astrue, 495 F.3d 614, 619 (8th Cir. 2007). “[A]n ALJ is permitted to issue a decision without obtaining additional medical evidence so long as other evidence in the record provides a sufficient basis for the ALJ’s decision.” Swink v. S…
quoting Anderson v. Shalala, 51 F.3d 777, 779 (8th Cir. 1995)
green
Bohlin v. Commissioner of Social Security (2024)
Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 769 (8th Cir. 2019).
green
Groce v. O'Malley (2024)
RFC Determination “A claimant's RFC is ‘the most he can still do despite his limitations.’” Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 769 (8th Cir. 2019) (quoting 20 C.F.R. § 404.1545 (a)(1)). “[T]he RFC determination is a ‘medical question’ that ‘must be supported by some medical evidence of [the claimant’s] ability to function in the workplace.’” Noerper v. Saul, 964 F.3d 738, 744 (8th Cir. 2020) (quoting Combs v. Berryhill, 878 F.3d 642, 646 (8th Cir. 2017)).
quoting 20 C.F.R. § 404.1545 (a)(1)
green
Heiden v. Commissioner of Social Security (2024)
Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 769 (8th Cir. 2019).
green
Sands v. Social Security Administration (2024)
Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 769 (8th Cir. 2019).
green
Madsen v. O'Malley (2024)
RFC Determination “A claimant's RFC is ‘the most he can still do despite his limitations.’” Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 769 (8th Cir. 2019) (quoting 20 C.F.R. § 404.1545 (a)(1)).
quoting 20 C.F.R. § 404.1545 (a)(1)
Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 770 (8th Cir. 2019) (holding ALJ is permitted to issue decision without obtaining additional medical evidence where other evidence in record provides sufficient basis for decision).
holding ALJ is permitted to issue decision without obtaining additional medical evidence where other evidence in record provides sufficient basis for decision
green
Kotz v. O'Malley (2024)
Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 771 (8th Cir. 2019); see also Schwandt v. Berryhill, 926 F.3d 1004 , 1012 (8th Cir. 2019) (“[A]n ALJ need not explicitly discuss each factor . . . and we will defer to credibility determinations that are supported by good reasons and substantial evidence.” (internal citation omitted)); Tr. 172-73 (citing objective medical evidence, claimant’s reported daily activities, and the reported effectiveness of medications).
green
Isaiah v. O'Malley (2024)
Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 771 (8th Cir. 2019); see also Schwandt v. Berryhill, 926 F.3d 1004 , 1012 (8th Cir. 2019) (“[A]n ALJ need not explicitly discuss each factor . . . and we will defer to credibility determinations that are supported by good reasons and substantial evidence.” (internal citation omitted)); Tr. 20-24 (citing objective medical evidence showing generally mild physical impairments; unremarkable exams indicating normal range of motion, strength, motor fun…
green
Littrell v. O'Malley (2024)
Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 771 (8th Cir. 2019); see also Schwandt v. Berryhill, 926 F.3d 1004 , 1012 (8th Cir. 2019) (“[A]n ALJ need not explicitly discuss each factor ... and we will defer to credibility determinations that are supported by good reasons and substantial evidence.” (internal citation omitted)); Tr. 25-27 (citing objective medical evidence, Littrell’s reported activities of daily living, her Function Report, her testimony, and the reported effectiveness of t…
green
McFadden v. Commissioner of Social Security (2024)
Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 769 (8th Cir. 2019); see also 20 C.F.R. § 404.1520 (a).
green
Williams v. Kijakazi (2024)
Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 769 (8th Cir. 2019) (quoting 42 U.S.C. § 404.1545 (a)(1)).
quoting 42 U.S.C. § 404.1545 (a)(1)
Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 770 (8th Cir. 2019) (holding ALJ permitted to issue decision without obtaining additional medical evidence where other evidence in record provided sufficient basis for decision).
holding ALJ permitted to issue decision without obtaining additional medical evidence where other evidence in record provided sufficient basis for decision
Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 770 (8th Cir. 2019) (holding ALJ permitted to issue decision without obtaining additional medical evidence where other evidence in record provided sufficient basis for decision).
holding ALJ permitted to issue decision without obtaining additional medical evidence where other evidence in record provided sufficient basis for decision
green
Lowe v. Kijakazi (2023)
Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 771 (8th Cir. 2019); see also Schwandt v. Berryhill, 926 F.3d 1004 , 1012 (8th Cir. 2019) (“[A]n ALJ need not explicitly discuss each factor . . . and we will defer to credibility determinations that are supported by good reasons and substantial evidence.” (internal citation omitted)); Tr. 172-73 (citing objective medical evidence, claimant’s reported daily activities, and the reported effectiveness of medications).
green
Whalen v. Kijakazi (2023)
See Grindley v. Kijakazi, 9 F.4th 622, 630 (8th Cir. 2021) (the ALJ’s determinations of credibility are ordinarily due deference by the courts); Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 771 (8th Cir. 2019) (an ALJ may decline to credit a plaintiff’s subjective complaints if the evidence as a whole is inconsistent with a plaintiff’s testimony).
an ALJ may decline to credit a plaintiff’s subjective complaints if the evidence as a whole is inconsistent with a plaintiff’s testimony
green
Stone v. Social Security Administration Commissioner (2023)
After reviewing this evidence, we find that the record contains ample evidence upon which the ALJ could base his decision. “‘[A]n ALJ is permitted to issue a decision without obtaining additional medical evidence so long as other evidence in the record provides a sufficient basis for the ALJ’s decision.’” Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 770 (8th Cir. 2019) (quoting Anderson v. Shalala, 51 F.3d 777, 779 (8th Cir. 1995)).
quoting Anderson v. Shalala, 51 F.3d 777, 779 (8th Cir. 1995)
green
Reichert v. Kijakazi (2023)
Conclusion “A claimant bears the burden of establishing [her] RFC.” Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 770 (8th Cir. 2019).
green
Moore v. Social Security Administration Commissioner (2023)
Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 770-71 (8th Cir. 2019).
green
Leach v. Kijakazi (2023)
“The ALJ is required to order medical examinations and tests only if the medical records presented to him do not give sufficient medical evidence to determine whether the claimant is disabled.” McCoy, 648 F.3d at 612 . “[A]n ALJ is permitted to issue a decision without obtaining additional medical evidence so long as other evidence in the record provides a sufficient basis for the ALJ’s decision.” Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 770 (8th Cir. 2019) (quoting Anderson v. Shalala,…
quoting Anderson v. Shalala, 51 F.3d 777, 779 (8th Cir. 1995)
green
Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security (2023)
See 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1520 (a)(4)(i)-(v), 416.920(a)(4)(i)-(v); Bowen v. Yuckert, 482 U.S. 137, 140-42 (1987); Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 769 (8th Cir. 2019); Moore v. Colvin, 769 F.3d 987, 988 (8th Cir. 2014).
green
Appleby v. Commissioner of Social Security (2023)
See 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1520 (a)(4)()-(v), 416.920(a)(4)(i)-(v); Bowen v. Yuckert, 482 U.S. 137, 140-42 (1987); Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 769 (8th Cir. 2019); Moore v. Colvin, 769 F.3d 987, 988 (8th Cir. 2014).
green
Mundy v. Commissioner of Social Security (2022)
See 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1520 (a)(4)(i)-(v), 416.920(a)(4)(i)-(v); Bowen v. Yuckert, 482 U.S. 137, 140-42 (1987); Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 769 (8th Cir. 2019); Moore v. Colvin, 769 F.3d 987, 988 (8th Cir. 2014).
green
Ivy v. Kijakazi (2022)
Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 771 (8th Cir. 2019).
green
Gould v. KIJAKAZI (2022)
Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 771 (8th Cir. 2019); Moser v. Kijakazi, No. 4:20 CV 724 ACL, 2021 WL 4476699 , at *4 (E.D.
green
Hart v. Saul (2022)
STANDARD OF REVIEW Judicial review of the Commissioner’s decision is a limited inquiry into whether substantial evidence supports the findings of the Commissioner and whether the correct legal standards were applied. 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g); Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 769 (8th Cir. 2019).
green
Lamar v. Kijakazi (2022)
The SSA has established a five-step, sequential evaluation process for appraising whether a claimant is disabled and benefit-eligible. 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1520 and 416.920; Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 769 (8th Cir. 2019); see also Kirby v. Astrue, 500 F.3d 705, 707 (8th Cir. 2007).
green
Ward v. Commissioner of Social Security (2022)
Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 769 (8th Cir. 2019).
green
Pennell v. Kijakazi (2022)
“A claimant’s RFC is the most [she] can still do despite [her] limitations.” Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 769 (8th Cir. 2019) (quotation omitted).
quotation omitted
green
Stapleton v. Kijakazi (2022)
Mo. Dec. 9, 2021) (citing Swing v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 770 (8th Cir. 2019)).
green
Gorman v. Kijakazi (2022)
The Five-Step Process “The regulations implementing the Act set forth a five-step, sequential process for determining whether a claimant is under a disability.” Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 769-70 (8th Cir. 2019); see also 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1520 (a), 416.920(a).
green
Khalif v. Saul (2020)
“Past this point, an ALJ is permitted to issue a decision without obtaining additional medical evidence so long as other evidence in the record provides a sufficient basis for the ALJ’s decision.” Id. (quotation omitted); see also Swink v. Saul, 931 F.3d 765, 770 (8th Cir. 2019) (“An ALJ is permitted to issue a decision without obtaining additional medical evidence so long as other evidence in the record provides a sufficient basis for the ALJ’s decision.”) (quotation omitte…
“An ALJ is permitted to issue a decision without obtaining additional medical evidence so long as other evidence in the record provides a sufficient basis for the ALJ’s decision.”