Glaze v. State (1907)
green
· 70 citation events
across 2 courts.
Showing the 10 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1907 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
190719662026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Wicker v. State (2007)
“It is . . . error to submit to the jury an issue which has no foundation in the evidence, or give instructions which are not applicable to the evidence, or to present a contention which is not urged by the party.” Glaze v. State, 2 Ga. App. 704, 708 ( 58 SE 1126 ) (1907).
green
Watts v. State (2003)
“Where there is only one defense on which a party relies, to fail to instruct the jury as to this defense so specifically that the jury will be not only required to pass upon it, but will be able to do so intelligently under pertinent rules of law and evidence, virtually withdraws that defense, and is, in effect, to direct a verdict.” Glaze v. State, 2 Ga. App. 704, 709 ( 58 SE 1126 ) (1907).
green
Langston v. State (1993)
In the latter it even contains the quantitative word “equal.” Instructions to the jury, particularly those explaining difficult concepts, are to be “the lamp ... to guide [the jury’s] feet in journeying through the testimony in search of a legal verdict.” Riley, supra at 655 . “[T]he charge of the court must contain such clear, apt, and definite exposition of the specific principles of law applicable to the case as will enable the jury to deal with the real issue in the case…
green
Johnson v. State (1983)
“Where there is only one defense on which a party relies, to fail to instruct the jury as to this defense so specifically that the jury will be not only required to pass upon it, but will be able to do so intelligently under pertinent rules of law and evidence, virtually withdraws that defense, and is, in effect, to directa verdict.” Glaze v. State, 2 Ga. App. 704, 709 ( 58 SE 1126 ).
green
Smith v. State (1978)
Where there is only one defense on which a party relies, to fail to instruct the jury as to this defense so specifically that the jury will be not only required to pass upon it, but will be able to do so intelligently under pertinent rules of law and evidence, virtually withdraws that defense, and is, in effect, to direct a verdict.” Glaze v. State, 2 Ga. App. 704, 708-709 ( 58 SE 1126 ) (1907) as cited in Harris v. State, 145 Ga. App. 675, 676 ( 244 SE2d 620 ) (1978).
green
Harris v. State (1978)
Where there is only one defense on which a party relies, to fail to instruct the jury as to this defense so specifically that the jury will be not only required to pass upon it, but will be able to do so intelligently under pertinent rules of law and evidence, virtually withdraws that defense, and is, in effect, to direct a verdict.” Glaze v. State, 2 Ga. App. 704, 708-709.
green
McKuhen v. State (1960)
In Sledge v. State, 99 Ga. 684 (2) ( 26 S. E. 756 ), this court said: “An intent to steal is a sub *76 stantive element in the commission of the offense of robbery, and a failure of the trial judge to so instruct a jury trying such a case is cause for a new trial.” See also Glaze v. State, 2 Ga. App. 704, 708 ( 58 S. E. 1126 ).
green
Powers v. State (1979)
See also Glaze v. State, 2 Ga. App. 704 ( 58 SE 1126 ); Sledge v. State, 99 Ga. 684 (2) ( 26 SE 756 ).
green
Stonaker v. State (1975)
See Glaze v. State, 2 Ga. App. 704 (2), 708, 709 ( 58 SE 1126 ); Reed v. State, 15 Ga. App. 435 (1) ( 83 SE 674 ); Thompson v. State, 16 Ga. App. 832 (4) ( 84 SE 591 ); Walker v. State, 86 Ga. App. 875, 879 ( 72 SE2d 774 ); McRoy v. State, 131 Ga. App. 307, 308 (4) ( 205 SE2d 445 ).
green
Felder v. State (1939)
See Glaze v. State, 2 Ga. App. 704, 710 ( 58 S. E. 1126 ).