How cited: Todd v. German American Insurance · Go Syfert

Todd v. German American Insurance (1907)

green · 117 citation events across 20 courts. Showing the 10 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1907 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
190719662026
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
I think the majority's view disregards the old maxims that "`[e]very fact or circumstance serving to elucidate or throw light upon the issue being tried, constitutes proper evidence in the case.' Sample v. Lipscomb, 18 Ga. 687 . `Where the competency of evidence is doubtful, it should go to the jury, that they may consider how far its force is impaired by surrounding incidents.' Augusta Factory v. Barnes, 72 Ga. 217 (5a) (53 Am.R. 838); and the converse of this rule has been…
green Patterson v. Castellaw (1969)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Co., 2 Ga. App. 789, 800 ( 59 SE 94 ).
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Co., 2 Ga. App. 789, 794 (2) ( 59 SE 94 ).
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Co., 2 Ga. App. 789, 800 ( 59 SE 94 ).
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Co., 2 Ga. App. 789, 803 ( 59 SE 94 ); Guy F. Atkinson Co. v. Fimian, 85 Ga. App. 200, 205 ( 68 SE2d 236 ); VII Wigmore On Evidence 57, 62 §§ 1946, 1947; Anno. 115 ALR 100 , 104.
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Co., 2 Ga. App. 789, 800 ( 59 SE 94 ) and Red Cypress Lumber Co. v. Perry, 118 Ga. 876 , supra, the appellants contend they were mere middlemen with no discretionary authority and thus the rule is applicable: “Another exception to the doctrine generally forbidding dual agencies is that the agent may represent both parties, provided that the acts in which he is to represent the one in nowise conflict with the full exercise of his duty to the other.
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Co., 2 Ga. App. 789, 794 (2) ( 59 SE 94 ).
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Co., 2 Ga. App. 789, 793 (1) ( 59 SE 94 ); New Jersey Ins.
Rule Authority · Ga.
In Todd v. German American Insurance Co., 2 Ga. App. 789, 793 (supra), the following statement was quoted from Joyce on Insurance, § 46: “All the essentials [of a contract of insurance] need not, however, be expressly negotiated upon, since they may be understood; as where the terms of the usual policy are presumed to have been intended; or where the usual rate of premium is presumed to have been meant; or in case the duration of the risk is understood to be the same as in a…
Cited · N.D. Ga. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Todd v. German-American Insurance Co., 2 Ga. App. 789, 800 , 59 S.E. 94 (1907).