Sargent v. State (2007)
green
· 58 citation events
across 2 courts.
Showing the 38 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2011 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
201120182026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Brandon Cunningham v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.) (2016)
Sargent v. State, 875 N.E.2d 762, 767 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007).
green
Miguel Perez v. State of Indiana (2013)
Sargent v. State, 875 N.E.2d 762, 767 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007).
green
Edward T. Bronaugh v. State of Indiana (2013)
Sargent v. State, 875 N.E.2d 762, 767 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007).
green
Eligah Thomas v. State of Indiana (2013)
Sargent v. State, 875 N.E.2d 762, 767 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007).
green
Marcous Ford v. State of Indiana (2012)
Sargent v. State, 875 N.E.2d 762, 767 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007). 3 I.C. § 35-46-1-4. 5 To convict Ford of Battery as charged, the State was required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Ford, being at least eighteen years of age, knowingly touched J.L., who was then younger then fourteen years of age, in a rude, insolent or angry manner, which resulted in serious bodily harm to J.L., namely, a substantial risk of death by subdural hematoma.
green
Victoria Peak v. State of Indiana (2012)
Sargent v. State, 875 N.E.2d 762, 767 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007).
green
Willie C. Napier v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.) (2018)
As such, we cannot say the trial court abused its discretion in identifying this as an aggravating factor. [11] Even assuming that the impact on the victims was improperly used as an aggravating factor, however, remand for resentencing would only be appropriate “if we cannot say with confidence that the trial court would have imposed the same sentence had it properly considered reasons that enjoy Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-CR-591 | November 16, 201…
green
Maddox Macy v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.) (2017)
Sargent v. State, 875 N.E.2d 762, 767 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007) Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 12A02-1703-CR-440 | August 17, 2017 Page 4 of 7 [13] Here, Macy was charged with Dissemination of Matter Harmful to Minors and Distribution or Exhibition of Obscene Matter.
green
Billie K. Hoots v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.) (2017)
Sargent v. State, 875 N.E.2d 762, 767 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007). [11] To convict Hoots of Public Intoxication, as charged, the State was required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Hoots was in a public place or place of public resort in a state of intoxication caused by Hoots’s use of a controlled substance, namely, methamphetamine, and that Hoot’s conduct was harassing, annoying, or alarming to Ridley.
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 71A05-1611-CR-2674 | March 21, 2017 Page 4 of 7 Sargent v. State, 875 N.E.2d 762, 767 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007). [15] The State charged Martin with Burglary, as a Level 5 felony.
green
Zachary Asher v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.) (2017)
Sargent v. State, 875 N.E.2d 762, 767 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007). [31] Here, to convict Asher as charged, the State was required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Asher knowingly carried a handgun in a vehicle or on his Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 49A02-1606-CR-1311 | January 13, 2017 Page 12 of 14 person, without being licensed as required by law, within 500 feet of a school.
green
Kazie Sekou Cole v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.) (2016)
Oster v. State, 992 N.E.2d 871, 875 (Ind. Ct. App. 2013), trans. denied. “‘If a reasonable trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty based on the probative evidence and reasonable inferences drawn therefrom, then a conviction will be affirmed.’” Holloway v. State, 51 N.E.3d 376, 378 (Ind. Ct. App. 2016) (quoting Sargent v. State, 875 N.E.2d 762, 767 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007)), trans. denied. [10] In order to convict Cole of battery resulting in bodily injury, a Class A …
green
Gerald Rachell v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.) (2016)
Sargent v. State, 875 N.E.2d 762, 767 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007). [12] Rachell was charged with Criminal Trespass under Indiana Code section 35-43- 2-2(b)(1).
green
Lamont Escoe v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.) (2016)
Sargent v. State, 875 N.E.2d 762, 767 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007).
green
Stacy Robey v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.) (2016)
Sargent v. State, 875 N.E.2d 762, 767 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007).
green
Charles L. Larson v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.) (2016)
Sargent v. State, 875 N.E.2d 762, 767 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007). [13] Larson was convicted of two counts of Child Molesting, as Level 1 felonies.
green
Demetrius Holloway v. State of Indiana (2016)
Sargent v. State, 875 N.E.2d 762, 767 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007) (citations omitted).
citations omitted
green
Holloway v. State (2016)
Sargent v. State, 875 N.E.2d 762, 767 (Ind.Ct.App.2007) (citations omitted).
green
Harrison Lime v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.) (2016)
Sargent v. State, 875 N.E.2d 762, 767 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007).
green
Corey Goodnight v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.) (2015)
Sargent v. State, 875 N.E.2d 762, 767 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007). [11] To convict Goodnight of Attempted Robbery, as a Class B felony, the State was required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Goodnight attempted to commit the offense of Robbery, as a Class B felony, by engaging in conduct that constituted a substantial step toward the commission of that crime.
green
Ted Mueller, Jr. v. State of Indiana (2014)
Sargent v. State, 875 N.E.2d 762, 769 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009).
green
Allan Kirkley v. State of Indiana (2014)
“A victim’s testimony, even if uncorroborated, is ordinarily sufficient to sustain a conviction for child molesting.” Sargent v. State, 875 N.E.2d 762, 767 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007).
green
Calvin Murphy v. State of Indiana (2014)
Sargent v. State, 875 N.E.2d 762, 767 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007).
green
Andrew Albert Graovac v. State of Indiana (2013)
Sargent v. State, 875 N.E.2d 762, 767 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007).
green
Erica Battle v. State of Indiana (2013)
Sargent v. State, 875 N.E.2d 762, 767 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007).
green
Sherard Taylor v. State of Indiana (2013)
Sargent v. State, 875 N.E.2d 762, 767 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007).
green
Mark Vickery v. State of Indiana (2013)
Sargent v. State, 875 N.E.2d 762, 767 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007).
green
Michael B. Buckner v. State of Indiana (2012)
Sargent v. State, 875 N.E.2d 762, 769 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007).
green
Jamey Taskey v. State of Indiana (2012)
Sargent v. State, 875 N.E.2d 762, 767 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007).
green
Donato Luna-Quintero v. State of Indiana (2012)
Sargent v. State, 875 N.E.2d 762, 767 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007).
green
Sterling Mitchell v. State of Indiana (2012)
Sargent v. State, 875 N.E.2d 762, 767 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007).
green
John Brooke v. State of Indiana (2012)
See Sargent v. State, 875 N.E.2d 762, 770 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007) (“If the defendant fails to advance a mitigating circumstance at sentencing, this court will presume that the circumstance is not significant and the defendant is precluded from advancing it as a mitigating circumstance for the first time on appeal.”).
“If the defendant fails to advance a mitigating circumstance at sentencing, this court will presume that the circumstance is not significant and the defendant is precluded from advancing it as a mitigating circumstance for the first time on appeal.”
green
In Re Dw (2011)
We therefore cannot agree with the suggestion in footnote 6 to the dissent that the decision of Maryland's highest court in Tapscott somehow undercuts Lusby or is "notabl[e]" in relation to the issue of evidentiary sufficiency now before us. [12] See also Sargent v. State, 875 N.E.2d 762, 767 (Ind.Ct.App.2007) ("The State presented sufficient evidence to establish that Sargent committed [two counts of incest].
green
Jordan L. Gosnell v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.) (2017)
See, e.g., Sargent v. State, 875 N.E.2d 762, 769 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007) (“If the factors are not supported by the record . . . then remand for resentencing may be the appropriate remedy if we cannot say with confidence that the trial court would have imposed the same sentence had it properly considered reasons that enjoy support in the record.”).
green
Michael French v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.) (2017)
See, e.g., Sargent v. State, 875 N.E.2d 762, 769 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007) (“If the factors are not supported by the record . . . then remand for resentencing may be the appropriate remedy if we cannot say with confidence that the trial court would have imposed the same sentence had it properly considered reasons that enjoy support in the record.”).
green
Quinn Nelson v. State of Indiana (2012)
See Sargent v. State, 875 N.E.2d 762, 767 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007).
green
Tavario Baskin v. State of Indiana (2012)
See Sargent v. State, 875 N.E.2d 762 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007).
green
In re D.W. (2011)
See also Sargent v. State, 875 N.E.2d 762, 767 (Ind.Ct.App.2007) ("The State presented sufficient evidence to establish that Sargent committed [two counts of incest], T.S. and Sargent both testified that T.S. was Sargent’s daughter.”); State v. Sockbeson, 430 A.2d 1105, 1106 (Me.1981) (”[T]he child’s statement that the defendant was her father and the defendant’s admission that she was his daughter were sufficient to prove their relationship and sustain a conviction of inces…