Prioli v. State Library (2001)
green
· 22 citation events
across 4 courts.
Showing the 2 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200120132026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Bernier v. Merrill Air Engineers (2001)
Spottiswoode, 1999 ME 79, ¶ 16 , 780 A.2d at 172. “[T]he definition of a trade secret is a matter of law,” while “the determination in a given case whether specific information is a trade secret is a factual question.” Ed Nowogroski Ins., Inc. v. Rucker, 137 Wash.2d 427 , 971 P.2d 936, 941 (1999) (citations omitted). [¶ 28] The first factor is the value of the information to Merrill and to Merrill’s competitors.
green
Pelc v. Southington Dental Associates, P.C. (2025)
This court repeatedly has declined to ‘‘read into th[is] unambigu- ous statute an exception to the word ‘all.’ ’’ Frantzen v. Davenport Electric, supra, 179 Conn. App. 853 ; see also Prioli v. State Library, 64 Conn. App. 301, 309 , 780 A.2d 172 (citing with approval board decision con- cluding that ‘‘[i]t would be inconsistent with both the clear meaning of those definitions and the humanitarian purpose of the Workers’ Compensation Act in general to read § 31-327 (b) as lim…