How cited: Donnelly v. Greenburgh Central School District No. 7 · Go Syfert

Donnelly v. Greenburgh Central School District No. 7 (2012)

green · 186 citation events across 14 courts. Showing the 50 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2012 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
201220192026
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 147 (2d Cir. 2012)).
Quote Authority · E.D.N.Y · signal: see · 4 citations in this opinion
Louis, 705 F.Supp. at 760 ; see Donnelly, 691 F.3d at 151 (“Zahorik is applicable only in the context of challenges to university tenure denials[ ] ... [and] is inapplicable to high school tenure contexts.”).
“Zahorik is applicable only in the context of challenges to university tenure denials[ ] ... [and] is inapplicable to high school tenure contexts.”
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y. · 2 citations in this opinion
No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 147 (2d Cir. 2012)).
Rule Authority · D. Conn. · 2 citations in this opinion
No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 147 (2d Cir. 2012) (quoting Potenza, 365 F.3d at 168 ).
quoting Potenza, 365 F.3d at 168
Rule Authority · W.D.N.Y. · 2 citations in this opinion
Dist., No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 147 (2d Cir. 2012) (internal quotation marks omitted).
internal quotation marks omitted
Quote Authority · E.D.N.Y · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
Mem. 7 n.1 (challenging qualifications only as defined under the ADA but not the FMLA); see also Donnelly , 691 F.3d at 151 ("[The] qualification necessary to shift the burden to defendant for an explanation of the adverse job action is minimal; plaintiff must show only that he possesses the basic skills necessary for performance of the job.").
"[The] qualification necessary to shift the burden to defendant for an explanation of the adverse job action is minimal; plaintiff must show only that he possesses the basic skills necessary for performance of the job."
Rule Authority · D. Conn.
No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 141 (2d Cir. 2012).
Rule Authority · D. Conn.
No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 141 (2d Cir. 2012).
Rule Authority · D. Conn.
No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 141 (2d Cir. 2012).
Rule Authority · D. Conn.
No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 141 (2d Cir. 2012).
Rule Authority · D. Conn.
No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 141 (2d Cir. 2012).
Rule Authority · D. Conn.
No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 141 (2d Cir. 2012).
Rule Authority · N.D.N.Y.
No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 151 (2d Cir. 2012), summary judgment is appropriate where the record evidence cannot support a reasonable inference that the plaintiff suffered a materially adverse employment action.
Rule Authority · E.D.N.Y
No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 146 (2d Cir. 2012) (“A jury reviewing the evidence in this record might well conclude that the evidence that Donnelly presents is insufficient to persuade it to find that he spent three or more hours beyond the CBA- maximum time engaged in activities integral to his employment.
Rule Authority · E.D.N.Y
No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 147 (2d Cir. 2012)).
Rule Authority · N.D.N.Y.
No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 152 (2d Cir. 2012).
green Saunders v. Doe (2025)
Rule Authority · D. Conn.
No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 141 (2d Cir. 2012).
green Rodriguez v. Doherty (2025)
Rule Authority · D. Conn.
No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 141 (2d Cir. 2012).
Rule Authority · E.D.N.Y
No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 152 (2d Cir. 2012) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
Rule Authority · E.D.N.Y
No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 141 (2d Cir. 2012).
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 141 (2d Cir. 2012) (internal quotation marks omitted).
internal quotation marks omitted
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 141 (2d Cir. 2012) (internal quotation marks omitted).
internal quotation marks omitted
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 147 (2d Cir. 2012)).
green Goode v. Jones (2025)
Rule Authority · D. Conn.
No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 141 (2d Cir. 2012).
green LaPolice v. FAM, LLC (2025)
Quote Authority · S.D.N.Y.
No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 147 (2d Cir. 2012) (“It is unusual for a plaintiff to fail to meet this standard.”); see also Calabro v. Westchester BMW, Inc., 398 F. Supp. 2d 281, 288 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) (finding ample support in Second Circuit caselaw adhering to the notion that a plaintiff need only demonstrate that she was qualified for the position).
“It is unusual for a plaintiff to fail to meet this standard.”
Rule Authority · D. Conn.
No. 7, 691 F. 3d 134, 151 (2d Cir. 2012), Ms. Elliott has at least demonstrated an issue of material fact as to whether or not she was qualified for each position.
green Firuz v. ADT Inc. (2025)
Rule Authority · E.D.N.Y
No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 147 (2d Cir. 2012)).
Rule Authority · E.D.N.Y
No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 147 (2d Cir. 2012) (same).
same
green Hernaiz v. Carlson (2025)
Rule Authority · D. Conn.
No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 141 (2d Cir. 2012).
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 147 (2d Cir. 2012)).
green Rosa v. Cook (2025)
Rule Authority · D. Conn.
No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 141 (2d Cir. 2012).
Rule Authority · Mich. Ct. App.
Donnelly v Greenburgh Cent Sch Dist No 7, 691 F3d 134, 142 (CA 2, 2012).
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 147 (2d Cir. 2012) (quoting Slattery v. Swiss Reinsurance Am.
quoting Slattery v. Swiss Reinsurance Am. Corp., 248 F.3d 87, 92 (2d Cir.2001)
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 147 (2d Cir.2012) (internal quotation marks omitted).
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 147 (2d Cir. 2012)). 2.
Rule Authority · E.D.N.Y
No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 141 (2d Cir. 2012) (quoting Matsushita Elec.
quoting Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587 (1986)
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 152 (2d Cir. 2012) (quotation marks and citation omitted).
quotation marks and citation omitted
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 147 (2d Cir. 2012) (internal quotation marks omitted).
internal quotation marks omitted
Rule Authority · W.D.N.Y.
No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 152 (2d Cir. 2012) (quotation marks and citation omitted).
quotation marks and citation omitted
Rule Authority · D. Conn.
No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 147 (2d Cir. 2012) (quoting Potenza, 365 F.3d at 168 (2d Cir.2004)).
quoting Potenza, 365 F.3d at 168 (2d Cir.2004)
green Devalda v. Faucher (2024)
Rule Authority · D. Conn.
No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 141 (2d Cir. 2012).
Rule Authority · E.D.N.Y
No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 141 (2d Cir. 2012) (quoting Matsushita Elec.
quoting Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587 (1986)
Rule Authority · E.D.N.Y
No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 141 (2d Cir. 2012) (alteration in original) (quoting Matsushita Elec.
alteration in original
Rule Authority · N.D.N.Y.
No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 141 (2d Cir. 2012) (quoting Matsushita Elec.
quoting Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587 (1986)
Rule Authority · N.D.N.Y.
No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 147 (2d Cir. 2012) (cleaned up).6 Where there is no direct evidence of retaliatory evidence, a plaintiff can raise an inference of retaliatory intent “by showing that the protected activity was closely followed in time by the adverse employment action.” Gorman-Bakos v. Cornell Co-op.
cleaned up
Rule Authority · E.D.N.Y
No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 147 (2d Cir. 2012) (citing same); Murray v. City of New York, No. 23-CV-10031, 2024 WL 3553266 , at *13 (S.D.N.Y.
citing same
Rule Authority · N.D.N.Y.
No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 141 (2d Cir. 2012) (quoting Matsushita Elec.
quoting Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587 , 106 S. Ct. 1348 , 89 L. Ed. 2d 538 (1986)
Rule Authority · N.D.N.Y.
No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 141 (2d Cir. 2012) (quoting Matsushita, 475 U.S. at 587 ).
quoting Matsushita, 475 U.S. at 587
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 137 (2d Cir. 2012)).
Rule Authority · E.D.N.Y
No. 7, 691 F.3d 134, 141 (2d Cir. 2012) (quoting Matsushita Elec.
quoting Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587 (1986)