Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1999–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Taylor v. Stategreen1 sentence2020Taylor v. State, 710 N.E.2d 921, 924 (Ind. 1999). [8] The General Assembly has decreed that a person is not justified in using force if, among other things, “the person has entered into combat with another person . . . unless the person withdraws from the encounter and communicates Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 19A-CR-2408 | April 16, 2020 Page 4 of 7 to the other person the intent to do so and the other person nevertheless continues or threatens to continue unlawful action.” I.C. § 35-41-3-2(g)(3). [9] In this case, there was a melee in the parking lot involving many peopl | 1 | 1 |
Currin v. Stategreen2 sentences2003In so holding, Griffin stated, "juror misconduct involving an out-of-court communication with an unauthorized person creates a rebuttable presumption of prejfu-dice." 3 754 N.E.2d at 901 (citing Currin v. State, 497 N.E.2d 1045, 1046 (Ind.1986)). 2003In so holding, Griffin stated, "juror misconduct involving an out-of-court communication with an unauthorized person creates a rebuttable presumption of prejudice." [3] 754 N.E.2d at 901 (citing Currin v. State, 497 N.E.2d 1045, 1046 (Ind.1986)). | 1 | 1 |
Harris v. Stategreen2 sentences1999See Harris, 425 N.E.2d at 155 . 1999See Harris, 425 N.E.2d at 155 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Wilson v. State
green
1 sentence2017Id. [11] The jury was presented with sufficient evidence from which it could have determined beyond a reasonable doubt that Robbins did not act in self-defense. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Matthew Bryant v. State of Indiana
green
1 sentence2017Id. [10] In this case, the State presented sufficient evidence for the finder of fact to determine beyond a reasonable doubt that the State had rebutted Vena’s claim of self-defense. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Griffin v. State
green
2 sentences2003In Griffin, our supreme court declined to overturn a conviction despite a claim that-upon request during deliberations-an alternate juror expressed her belief, supported by her reasoning, that the defendant was guilty. 754 N.E.2d at 900 . 2003In Griffin , our supreme court declined to overturn a conviction despite a claim that—upon request during deliberations—an alternate juror expressed her belief, supported by her reasoning, that the defendant was guilty. 754 N.E.2d at 900 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.