Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1991–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Waller v. Georgiagreen2 sentences2018See, e.g. , Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39 , 42 n.2, 104 S.Ct. 2210 , 81 L.Ed.2d 31 (1984) (acknowledging that, when a defendant consents to a courtroom closure, he may be "procedurally barred from seeking relief as a matter of state law"); Faretta v. California , 422 U.S. 806 , 807, 834 n.46, 95 S.Ct. 2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975) (noting that, while "a defendant in a state criminal trial has a constitutional right to proceed without counsel," he "cannot thereafter complain that the quality of his own defense amounted to a denial of effective assistance of counsel") (internal quotation marks o 2018See, e.g. , Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39 , 42 n.2, 104 S.Ct. 2210 , 81 L.Ed.2d 31 (1984) (acknowledging that, when a defendant consents to a courtroom closure, he may be "procedurally barred from seeking relief as a matter of state law"); Faretta v. California , 422 U.S. 806 , 807, 834 n.46, 95 S.Ct. 2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975) (noting that, while "a defendant in a state criminal trial has a constitutional right to proceed without counsel," he "cannot thereafter complain that the quality of his own defense amounted to a denial of effective assistance of counsel") (internal quotation marks o | 1 | 1 |
Kingery v. Stategreen1 sentence2012See Kingery v. State, 659 N.E.2d 490, 494 (Ind. 1995) (concluding that a defendant invited the error he challenges on appeal by eliciting the evidence which he now challenges). | 1 | 1 |
Thacker v. Stategreen1 sentence2012“An appellant cannot maintain grounds for reversible error when the defendant invited the error.” Thacker v. State, 578 N.E.2d 784, 786 (Ind. Ct. App. 1991) (concluding that it was invited error for the appellant to elicit testimony from a witness on cross-examination at trial but then claim error in the admission of the testimony on appeal). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Christapher Batchelor v. State of Indiana
green
1 sentence2020Id. at 558 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Faretta v. California
green
2 sentences2018See, e.g. , Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39 , 42 n.2, 104 S.Ct. 2210 , 81 L.Ed.2d 31 (1984) (acknowledging that, when a defendant consents to a courtroom closure, he may be "procedurally barred from seeking relief as a matter of state law"); Faretta v. California , 422 U.S. 806 , 807, 834 n.46, 95 S.Ct. 2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975) (noting that, while "a defendant in a state criminal trial has a constitutional right to proceed without counsel," he "cannot thereafter complain that the quality of his own defense amounted to a denial of effective assistance of counsel") (internal quotation marks o 2018See, e.g. , Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39 , 42 n.2, 104 S.Ct. 2210 , 81 L.Ed.2d 31 (1984) (acknowledging that, when a defendant consents to a courtroom closure, he may be "procedurally barred from seeking relief as a matter of state law"); Faretta v. California , 422 U.S. 806 , 807, 834 n.46, 95 S.Ct. 2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975) (noting that, while "a defendant in a state criminal trial has a constitutional right to proceed without counsel," he "cannot thereafter complain that the quality of his own defense amounted to a denial of effective assistance of counsel") (internal quotation marks o | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Cassano
green
1 sentence2018App. Mar. 7, 2018) ("This Court and other courts often apply the doctrine of invited error to rule against defendants on a wide variety of matters, including errors that might amount to fundamental or structural errors."); State v. Cassano , 96 Ohio St.3d 94 , 772 N.E.2d 81 , 95 (2002) (concluding that the trial court erred in closing a hearing to the public absent specific findings justifying such closure but declining reversal since the defendant invited the error by requesting the closure to begin with in an effort to avoid prejudicial publicity); State v. Benton , 858 N.W.2d 535 , 540 (Min | 1 | 2018–2018 |
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Barbara Ann NIMIS, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 235428
green
1 sentence2018App. Mar. 7, 2018) ("This Court and other courts often apply the doctrine of invited error to rule against defendants on a wide variety of matters, including errors that might amount to fundamental or structural errors."); State v. Cassano , 96 Ohio St.3d 94 , 772 N.E.2d 81 , 95 (2002) (concluding that the trial court erred in closing a hearing to the public absent specific findings justifying such closure but declining reversal since the defendant invited the error by requesting the closure to begin with in an effort to avoid prejudicial publicity); State v. Benton , 858 N.W.2d 535 , 540 (Min | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Lacy v. State
green
1 sentence1991Cf. Lacy v. State (1982), Ind., 438 N.E.2d 968, 971 . | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.