income eligibility test (Indiana) · Go Syfert
← Indiana issues

income eligibility test in Indiana

5 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 1998–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Roloff v. Sullivangreen
ca7 · 1992 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 1998–1998
1 sentence

1998Roloff v. Sullivan, 975 F.2d 333, 337 (7th Cir.1992).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Ada Brown v. Indiana Family and Social Services Administration green
indctapp · 2015
2 sentences

2020If either the applicant’s income or the value of the applicant’s resources is too high, the applicant does not qualify for Medicaid.” Id. (citation omitted). [9] In this case, we are concerned only with Hotmer’s income eligibility.

2019Id.

22019–2020
State v. Hammans green
indctapp · 2007
1 sentence

2018State v. Hammans , 870 N.E.2d 1071 , 1074 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007). [12] In 1993, Congress passed the federal Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 (OBRA '93).

12018–2018
State, Family & Social Services Administration v. Thrush green
indctapp · 1998
1 sentence

2015Id.

12015–2015

Where else courts name it

IN 5 (1998–2020) CT 3 (2014–2016)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check