Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 1985–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Yanceygreen1 sentence2018Berron v. Illinois Concealed Carry Licensing Review Bd. , 825 F.3d 843 , 847 (7th Cir. 2016) (citing Heller , 554 U.S. at 626 -28 , 128 S.Ct. 2783 ), cert. denied ; see also Yancey , 621 F.3d at 684-85 (citations and quotation omitted) ("Whatever the pedigree of the rule against even nonviolent felons possessing weapons (which was codified in federal law in 1938), most scholars of the Second Amendment agree that the right to bear arms was tied to the concept of a virtuous citizenry and that, accordingly, the government could disarm unvirtuous citizens."). 7 Neither party to this appeal has add | 1 | 1 |
In Re Paternity of Tompkinsgreen2 sentences1993See In re Paternity of Tompkins (1989), Ind.App., 542 N.E.2d 1009, 1012 (the pedigree exception permits admission of a declarant’s out of court declarations regarding parentage or ancestry. 1993See In re Paternity of Tompkins (1989), Ind.App., 542 N.E.2d 1009, 1012 (the pedigree exception permits admission of a declarant’s out of court declarations regarding parentage or ancestry. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Schaller
green
2 sentences1989State v. Schaller (1942), 111 Ind.App. 128 , 40 N.E.2d 976 . 1989State v. Schaller (1942), 111 Ind.App. 128 , 40 N.E.2d 976 . | 3 | 1985–1989 |
Emberry Community Church v. Bloomington District Missionary & Church Extension Society, Inc.
green
2 sentences1989Brown argues that the pedigree exception did not apply here since Mills did not establish that the witness was intimately associated with the family and cites in support the decision of the First District in Emberry Community Church v. Bloomington District Missionary and Church Extension Society, Inc. (1985), Ind. App., 482 N.E.2d 288 . 1989Brown argues that the pedigree exception did not apply here since Mills did not establish that the witness was intimately associated with the family and cites in support the decision of the First District in Emberry Community Church v. Bloomington District Missionary and Church Extension Society, Inc. (1985), Ind.App., 482 N.E.2d 288 . | 2 | 1989–1989 |
District of Columbia v. Heller
green
2 sentences2018Berron v. Illinois Concealed Carry Licensing Review Bd. , 825 F.3d 843 , 847 (7th Cir. 2016) (citing Heller , 554 U.S. at 626 -28 , 128 S.Ct. 2783 ), cert. denied ; see also Yancey , 621 F.3d at 684-85 (citations and quotation omitted) ("Whatever the pedigree of the rule against even nonviolent felons possessing weapons (which was codified in federal law in 1938), most scholars of the Second Amendment agree that the right to bear arms was tied to the concept of a virtuous citizenry and that, accordingly, the government could disarm unvirtuous citizens."). 7 Neither party to this appeal has add 2018Berron v. Illinois Concealed Carry Licensing Review Bd. , 825 F.3d 843 , 847 (7th Cir. 2016) (citing Heller , 554 U.S. at 626 -28 , 128 S.Ct. 2783 ), cert. denied ; see also Yancey , 621 F.3d at 684-85 (citations and quotation omitted) ("Whatever the pedigree of the rule against even nonviolent felons possessing weapons (which was codified in federal law in 1938), most scholars of the Second Amendment agree that the right to bear arms was tied to the concept of a virtuous citizenry and that, accordingly, the government could disarm unvirtuous citizens."). 7 Neither party to this appeal has add | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Berron v. Illinois Concealed Carry Licensing Review Board
green
1 sentence2018Berron v. Illinois Concealed Carry Licensing Review Bd. , 825 F.3d 843 , 847 (7th Cir. 2016) (citing Heller , 554 U.S. at 626 -28 , 128 S.Ct. 2783 ), cert. denied ; see also Yancey , 621 F.3d at 684-85 (citations and quotation omitted) ("Whatever the pedigree of the rule against even nonviolent felons possessing weapons (which was codified in federal law in 1938), most scholars of the Second Amendment agree that the right to bear arms was tied to the concept of a virtuous citizenry and that, accordingly, the government could disarm unvirtuous citizens."). 7 Neither party to this appeal has add | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.