Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 2012–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Agnew v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2012Tracy, 948 N.E.2d at 866 ; see also Poppe v. Jabaay, 804 N.E.2d 789, 796 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004) (noting that rescission of a contract may be available in cases of “fraud, illegality, or mutual mistake”), trans. denied, cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1164 , 125 S. Ct. 1333 (2005); Franklin v. White, 493 N.E.2d 161 (Ind. 1986) (holding rescission of contract proper after determination of mutual mistake of fact). 2012Tracy, 948 N.E.2d at 866 ; see also Poppe v. Jabaay, 804 N.E.2d 789, 796 (Ind.Ct.App.2004) (noting that rescission of a contract may be available in cases of "fraud, illegality, or mutual mistake"), trans. denied, cert. denied, 548 U.S. 1164 , 125 S.Ct. 1333 , 161 L.Ed.2d 188 (2005); Franklin v. White, 493 N.E.2d 161 (Ind.1986) (holding rescission of contract proper after determination of mutual mistake of fact). | 2 | 2 |
Poppe v. Jabaaygreen2 sentences2012Tracy, 948 N.E.2d at 866 ; see also Poppe v. Jabaay, 804 N.E.2d 789, 796 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004) (noting that rescission of a contract may be available in cases of “fraud, illegality, or mutual mistake”), trans. denied, cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1164 , 125 S. Ct. 1333 (2005); Franklin v. White, 493 N.E.2d 161 (Ind. 1986) (holding rescission of contract proper after determination of mutual mistake of fact). 2012Tracy, 948 N.E.2d at 866 ; see also Poppe v. Jabaay, 804 N.E.2d 789, 796 (Ind.Ct.App.2004) (noting that rescission of a contract may be available in cases of "fraud, illegality, or mutual mistake"), trans. denied, cert. denied, 548 U.S. 1164 , 125 S.Ct. 1333 , 161 L.Ed.2d 188 (2005); Franklin v. White, 493 N.E.2d 161 (Ind.1986) (holding rescission of contract proper after determination of mutual mistake of fact). | 2 | 2 |
Stevens v. Olsengreen1 sentence2025Way, LLC v. APM Rental Props., LLC, 52 N.E.3d 854, 861 (Ind. Ct. App. 2016) (providing that a rescission claim invokes the equitable jurisdiction of the court, so “no right to trial by jury exists”) (citation and quotation marks omitted); Stevens v. Olsen, 713 N.E.2d 889, 891 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999) (“As of June 18, 1852, an action for rescission of a contract was of exclusive equitable jurisdiction. | 1 | 1 |
3155 Development Way, LLC v. APM Rental Properties, LLCgreen1 sentence2025Way, LLC v. APM Rental Props., LLC, 52 N.E.3d 854, 861 (Ind. Ct. App. 2016) (providing that a rescission claim invokes the equitable jurisdiction of the court, so “no right to trial by jury exists”) (citation and quotation marks omitted); Stevens v. Olsen, 713 N.E.2d 889, 891 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999) (“As of June 18, 1852, an action for rescission of a contract was of exclusive equitable jurisdiction. | 1 | 1 |
Sanchez Vasquez v. Giurbino, Wardengreen1 sentence2012Tracy, 948 N.E.2d at 866 ; see also Poppe v. Jabaay, 804 N.E.2d 789, 796 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004) (noting that rescission of a contract may be available in cases of “fraud, illegality, or mutual mistake”), trans. denied, cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1164 , 125 S. Ct. 1333 (2005); Franklin v. White, 493 N.E.2d 161 (Ind. 1986) (holding rescission of contract proper after determination of mutual mistake of fact). | 1 | 1 |
Ventimiglia v. St. Louis County, Missourigreen1 sentence2012Tracy, 948 N.E.2d at 866 ; see also Poppe v. Jabaay, 804 N.E.2d 789, 796 (Ind.Ct.App.2004) (noting that rescission of a contract may be available in cases of "fraud, illegality, or mutual mistake"), trans. denied, cert. denied, 548 U.S. 1164 , 125 S.Ct. 1333 , 161 L.Ed.2d 188 (2005); Franklin v. White, 493 N.E.2d 161 (Ind.1986) (holding rescission of contract proper after determination of mutual mistake of fact). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Tracy v. Morell
green
2 sentences2012Tracy, 948 N.E.2d at 866 ; see also Poppe v. Jabaay, 804 N.E.2d 789, 796 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004) (noting that rescission of a contract may be available in cases of “fraud, illegality, or mutual mistake”), trans. denied, cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1164 , 125 S. Ct. 1333 (2005); Franklin v. White, 493 N.E.2d 161 (Ind. 1986) (holding rescission of contract proper after determination of mutual mistake of fact). 2012Tracy, 948 N.E.2d at 866 ; see also Poppe v. Jabaay, 804 N.E.2d 789, 796 (Ind.Ct.App.2004) (noting that rescission of a contract may be available in cases of "fraud, illegality, or mutual mistake"), trans. denied, cert. denied, 548 U.S. 1164 , 125 S.Ct. 1333 , 161 L.Ed.2d 188 (2005); Franklin v. White, 493 N.E.2d 161 (Ind.1986) (holding rescission of contract proper after determination of mutual mistake of fact). | 2 | 2012–2012 |
Franklin v. White
green
2 sentences2012Tracy, 948 N.E.2d at 866 ; see also Poppe v. Jabaay, 804 N.E.2d 789, 796 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004) (noting that rescission of a contract may be available in cases of “fraud, illegality, or mutual mistake”), trans. denied, cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1164 , 125 S. Ct. 1333 (2005); Franklin v. White, 493 N.E.2d 161 (Ind. 1986) (holding rescission of contract proper after determination of mutual mistake of fact). 2012Tracy, 948 N.E.2d at 866 ; see also Poppe v. Jabaay, 804 N.E.2d 789, 796 (Ind.Ct.App.2004) (noting that rescission of a contract may be available in cases of "fraud, illegality, or mutual mistake"), trans. denied, cert. denied, 548 U.S. 1164 , 125 S.Ct. 1333 , 161 L.Ed.2d 188 (2005); Franklin v. White, 493 N.E.2d 161 (Ind.1986) (holding rescission of contract proper after determination of mutual mistake of fact). | 2 | 2012–2012 |
Inman v. Inman
green
1 sentence2019Inman v. Inman , 898 N.E.2d 1281 , 1284 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Howell v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
green
1 sentence2016Accordingly, we find that the rescission claim has “invoke[d] the equitable jurisdiction of the court,” and so “the entire action is drawn into and tried as a matter of equity and no right to trial by jury exists.” Howell, 530 N.E.2d at 319 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.