Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 1989–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Martin v. Nealgreen2 sentences2011Therefore, Stepfather is a legal custodian of L.C.E., see Martin v. Neal, 125 Ind. 547, 552 , 25 N.E. 813, 815 (1890) (court order is valid if court issuing order has jurisdiction over parties and subject matter of the action), and has a meritorious defense to the adoption order he wishes to have set aside. 2011Therefore, Stepfather is a legal custodian of L.C.E., see Martin v. Neal, 125 Ind. 547, 552 , 25 N.E. 813, 815 (1890) (court order is valid if court issuing order has jurisdiction over parties and subject matter of the action), and has a meritorious defense to the adoption order he wishes to have set aside. | 2 | 2 |
In Re NEgreen1 sentence2026CHINS proceedings are civil actions; thus, “the State must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that a child is a CHINS as defined by the juvenile code.” In re N.E., 228 N.E.3d 457 , 475 (Ind. Ct. App. 2024) (quoting In re N.E., 919 N.E.2d 102, 105 (Ind. 2010)); see Ind. Code § 31-34-12-3 . | 1 | 1 |
In the Matter of S.D., Alleged to be a Child in Need of Services J.B. v. Indiana Department of Child Servicesgreen1 sentence2016See S.D., 2 N.E.3d at 1290 (CHINS finding should consider the family’s condition not just when the case is filed, but also when it is heard). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Gribble v. Gribble
green
2 sentences1989In Gribble v. Gribble (1978), Utah, 583 P.2d 64 , 1 A.L.R.4th 1263 , the supreme court of Utah granted a stepfather a hearing to determine if he stood in loco parentis to his stepson intimating this status would entitle him to visitation privileges. 1989In Gribble v. Gribble (1978), Utah, 583 P.2d 64 , 1 A.L.R.4th 1263 , the supreme court of Utah granted a stepfather a hearing to determine if he stood in loco parentis to his stepson intimating this status would entitle him to visitation privileges. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.