Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1998–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Galloway v. Stategreen2 sentences2017However, “a defendant who is mentally ill but fails to establish that he is she was unable to appreciate the wrongfulness of his or her conduct may be found guilty but mentally ill.” Galloway, 938 N.E.2d at 708 [24] Barcroft’s argument on appeal is that there was insufficient evidence in the record from which the trial court could have inferred that she was sane at the time she shot Pastor Iseminger, contrary to what the three experts determined. 2017However, "a defendant who is mentally ill but fails to *455 establish that he is she was unable to appreciate the wrongfulness of his or her conduct may be found guilty but mentally ill." Galloway , 938 N.E.2d at 708 [24] Barcroft's argument on appeal is that there was insufficient evidence in the record from which the trial court could have inferred that she was sane at the time she shot Pastor Iseminger, contrary to what the three experts determined. | 2 | 2 |
Tammy Lou Kelly v. State of Indianagreen2 sentences2017“A successful insanity defense results in the defendant being found not responsible by reason of insanity.” Kelley v. State, 2 N.E.3d 777, 783 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014); see also I.C. § 35-41-3-6(a). 2017"A successful insanity defense results in the defendant being found not responsible by reason of insanity." Kelley v. State , 2 N.E.3d 777 , 783 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014) ; see also I.C. § 35-41-3-6(a). | 1 | 1 |
Gonzales v. Stategreen1 sentence1998See Gonzales v. State, 642 N.E.2d 216, 216-17 (Ind.1994); Matheney, 583 N.E.2d at 1206 ; Rowe, 539 N.E.2d at 477 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Wilson v. State
green
2 sentences2012In concluding the trial court correctly refused Wilson's reckless homicide instruction, this Court said, "[b]ecause a successful insanity defense would make Wilson nonculpable for any offenses he may have committed, the insanity defense cannot be the mechanism to demonstrate dispute entitling him to a lesser included instruction." Id. at 475 . 2012In concluding the trial court correctly refused Wilson’s reckless homicide instruction, this Court said, “[bjecause a successful insanity defense would make Wilson nonculpable for any offenses he may have committed, the insanity defense cannot be the mechanism to demonstrate dispute entitling him to a lesser included instruction.” Id. at 475 . | 2 | 2011–2012 |
Matheney v. State
green
1 sentence1998See Gonzales v. State, 642 N.E.2d 216, 216-17 (Ind.1994); Matheney, 583 N.E.2d at 1206 ; Rowe, 539 N.E.2d at 477 . | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Rowe v. State
green
1 sentence1998See Gonzales v. State, 642 N.E.2d 216, 216-17 (Ind.1994); Matheney, 583 N.E.2d at 1206 ; Rowe, 539 N.E.2d at 477 . | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.