Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1910–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Black v. Campbellgreen1 sentence1910Co. v. Sutton (1892), 130 Ind. 405, 412, 413 ; Ely v. Board, etc. (1887), 112 Ind. 361, 365-369 ; Black v. Campbell (1887), 112 Ind. 122, 126, 127 ; Hume v. Little Flatrock, etc., Assn. (1880), 72 Ind. 499, 504 ; Green v. Elliott (1882), 86 Ind. 53, 60 ; Osborn v. Sutton, supra; Cason v. Harrison, supra. As appellants did not present said application to withdraw from the petition in the court below and obtain a ruling as to the effect thereof on the jurisdiction of the board, this waived the error, if any was committed by the board, in regard to said application. | 1 | 1 |
Chicago & Atlantic Railway Co. v. Suttongreen1 sentence1910Co. v. Sutton (1892), 130 Ind. 405, 412, 413 ; Ely v. Board, etc. (1887), 112 Ind. 361, 365-369 ; Black v. Campbell (1887), 112 Ind. 122, 126, 127 ; Hume v. Little Flatrock, etc., Assn. (1880), 72 Ind. 499, 504 ; Green v. Elliott (1882), 86 Ind. 53, 60 ; Osborn v. Sutton, supra; Cason v. Harrison, supra. As appellants did not present said application to withdraw from the petition in the court below and obtain a ruling as to the effect thereof on the jurisdiction of the board, this waived the error, if any was committed by the board, in regard to said application. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Madden v. State
green
1 sentence2017Id. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Brown v. State
green
2 sentences2014Our court may review a waived claim if “a fundamental error occurred.” Id. 2014Our court may review a waived claim if "a fundamental error occurred." Id. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Morris v. Nixon
neutral
2 sentences1950Morris v. Nixon (1946), 117 Ind. App. 106 , 67 N. E. 2d 319 . 1950Morris v. Nixon (1946), 117 Ind. App. 106 , 67 N. E. 2d 319 . | 1 | 1950–1950 |
King v. Inland Steel Co.
green
2 sentences1916King v. Inland Steel Co. (1911), 177 Ind. 201 , 96 N. E. 337 , 97 N. E. 529 . 5. 6. 5. 1916King v. Inland Steel Co. (1911), 177 Ind. 201 , 96 N. E. 337 , 97 N. E. 529 . 5. 6. 5. | 1 | 1916–1916 |
Hume v. Little Flat Rock Draining Ass'n
neutral
1 sentence1910Co. v. Sutton (1892), 130 Ind. 405, 412, 413 ; Ely v. Board, etc. (1887), 112 Ind. 361, 365-369 ; Black v. Campbell (1887), 112 Ind. 122, 126, 127 ; Hume v. Little Flatrock, etc., Assn. (1880), 72 Ind. 499, 504 ; Green v. Elliott (1882), 86 Ind. 53, 60 ; Osborn v. Sutton, supra; Cason v. Harrison, supra. As appellants did not present said application to withdraw from the petition in the court below and obtain a ruling as to the effect thereof on the jurisdiction of the board, this waived the error, if any was committed by the board, in regard to said application. | 1 | 1910–1910 |
Green v. Elliott
green
1 sentence1910Co. v. Sutton (1892), 130 Ind. 405, 412, 413 ; Ely v. Board, etc. (1887), 112 Ind. 361, 365-369 ; Black v. Campbell (1887), 112 Ind. 122, 126, 127 ; Hume v. Little Flatrock, etc., Assn. (1880), 72 Ind. 499, 504 ; Green v. Elliott (1882), 86 Ind. 53, 60 ; Osborn v. Sutton, supra; Cason v. Harrison, supra. As appellants did not present said application to withdraw from the petition in the court below and obtain a ruling as to the effect thereof on the jurisdiction of the board, this waived the error, if any was committed by the board, in regard to said application. | 1 | 1910–1910 |
Ely v. Board of Commissioners
neutral
1 sentence1910Co. v. Sutton (1892), 130 Ind. 405, 412, 413 ; Ely v. Board, etc. (1887), 112 Ind. 361, 365-369 ; Black v. Campbell (1887), 112 Ind. 122, 126, 127 ; Hume v. Little Flatrock, etc., Assn. (1880), 72 Ind. 499, 504 ; Green v. Elliott (1882), 86 Ind. 53, 60 ; Osborn v. Sutton, supra; Cason v. Harrison, supra. As appellants did not present said application to withdraw from the petition in the court below and obtain a ruling as to the effect thereof on the jurisdiction of the board, this waived the error, if any was committed by the board, in regard to said application. | 1 | 1910–1910 |
Cason v. Harrison
neutral
2 sentences1910Co. v. Sutton (1892), 130 Ind. 405, 412, 413 ; Ely v. Board, etc. (1887), 112 Ind. 361, 365-369 ; Black v. Campbell (1887), 112 Ind. 122, 126, 127 ; Hume v. Little Flatrock, etc., Assn. (1880), 72 Ind. 499, 504 ; Green v. Elliott (1882), 86 Ind. 53, 60 ; Osborn v. Sutton, supra; Cason v. Harrison, supra. As appellants did not present said application to withdraw from the petition in the court below and obtain a ruling as to the effect thereof on the jurisdiction of the board, this waived the error, if any was committed by the board, in regard to said application. 1910Cason v. Harrison, supra, and cases cited. 5. | 1 | 1910–1910 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.