Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 2013–2024 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Kahlergreen2 sentences2024EIGHTH AMENDMENT CHALLENGE Flack raises a categorical Eighth Amendment challenge to his death sentence, even though he acknowledges we recently addressed and rejected nearly identical claims in Kleypas II, 305 Kan. at 328, 337, and State v. Kahler, 307 Kan. 374, 406, 409 , 410 P.3d 105 (2018). 2024EIGHTH AMENDMENT CHALLENGE Flack raises a categorical Eighth Amendment challenge to his death sentence, even though he acknowledges we recently addressed and rejected nearly identical claims in Kleypas II, 305 Kan. at 328, 337, and State v. Kahler, 307 Kan. 374, 406, 409 , 410 P.3d 105 (2018). | 2 | 2 |
Graham v. Floridagreen2 sentences2022See Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48, 59-60 , 6 130 S. Ct. 2011 , 176 L. 2022See Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48, 59-60 , 6 130 S. Ct. 2011 , 176 L. | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Dull
green
1 sentence2020Dull, 302 Kan. at 40 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Mossman
green
2 sentences2013In Graham , the United States Supreme Court considered the proportionality of a term-of-years sentence “ ‘as it applie[d] to an entire class of offenders who have committed a range of crimes.’ ” State v. Mossman, 294 Kan. 901, 928 , 281 P.3d 153 (2012) (quoting Graham, 130 S. Ct. at 2022-23 ). 2013In Graham , the United States Supreme Court considered the proportionality of a term-of-years sentence “ ‘as it applie[d] to an entire class of offenders who have committed a range of crimes.’ ” State v. Mossman, 294 Kan. 901, 928 , 281 P.3d 153 (2012) (quoting Graham, 130 S. Ct. at 2022-23 ). | 1 | 2013–2013 |