Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1916–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Hendersongreen1 sentence2013See 114 Wash. 2d at 878-79 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Redick
green
1 sentence2026The Redick court would have preferred a more expansive colloquy on the jury trial process but held the judge's remarks were "minimally sufficient." 307 Kan. at 804 . 5 The district court's colloquy in Harris failed to clear the bar set by Redick, resulting in a defective waiver. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
State v. Hargrove
green
1 sentence2021But if the record shows that defense counsel strategically sought the instruction, then the doctrine precludes appellate review. 308 Kan. at 1217-18 (applying State v. Hargrove, 48 Kan. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. Davis
neutral
1 sentence1925Co. v. Davis, 34 Kan. 199 , 8 Pac. 146 ; State v. Whisner, 35 Kan. 271 , 10 Pac. 852 .) Plaintiff contends the court erred in refusing a new trial, to which he was entitled because of the defective hearing of one of the jurors. | 1 | 1925–1925 |
State v. Whisner
neutral
1 sentence1925Co. v. Davis, 34 Kan. 199 , 8 Pac. 146 ; State v. Whisner, 35 Kan. 271 , 10 Pac. 852 .) Plaintiff contends the court erred in refusing a new trial, to which he was entitled because of the defective hearing of one of the jurors. | 1 | 1925–1925 |
Vickers v. Buck Stove & Range Co.
green
2 sentences1916(Vickers v. Buck, 60 Kan. 598, 605 , 57 Pac. 517 ; Munn v. Gordon, 87 Kan. 519 , 125 Pac. 7 .) But whether or not the judge accepts any or all of the jury’s findings, and whether or not he adds to them, he exercises his independent judgment, and his adoption of a finding already made by the jury involves no different mental process from formulating it on his own account. • A defective instruction involves no more serious consequences in the one case than in the other. 1916(Vickers v. Buck, 60 Kan. 598, 605 , 57 Pac. 517 ; Munn v. Gordon, 87 Kan. 519 , 125 Pac. 7 .) But whether or not the judge accepts any or all of the jury’s findings, and whether or not he adds to them, he exercises his independent judgment, and his adoption of a finding already made by the jury involves no different mental process from formulating it on his own account. • A defective instruction involves no more serious consequences in the one case than in the other. | 1 | 1916–1916 |
Linscott v. Conner
neutral
2 sentences1916(Linscott v. Conner, 85 Kan. 865 , 118 Pac. 693 ; 16 Cyc. 422.) The judgment is affirmed. 1916(Linscott v. Conner, 85 Kan. 865 , 118 Pac. 693 ; 16 Cyc. 422.) The judgment is affirmed. | 1 | 1916–1916 |
Munn v. Gordon
green
2 sentences1916(Vickers v. Buck, 60 Kan. 598, 605 , 57 Pac. 517 ; Munn v. Gordon, 87 Kan. 519 , 125 Pac. 7 .) But whether or not the judge accepts any or all of the jury’s findings, and whether or not he adds to them, he exercises his independent judgment, and his adoption of a finding already made by the jury involves no different mental process from formulating it on his own account. • A defective instruction involves no more serious consequences in the one case than in the other. 1916(Vickers v. Buck, 60 Kan. 598, 605 , 57 Pac. 517 ; Munn v. Gordon, 87 Kan. 519 , 125 Pac. 7 .) But whether or not the judge accepts any or all of the jury’s findings, and whether or not he adds to them, he exercises his independent judgment, and his adoption of a finding already made by the jury involves no different mental process from formulating it on his own account. • A defective instruction involves no more serious consequences in the one case than in the other. | 1 | 1916–1916 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.