Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1933–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Scottsdale Insurance v. Deere & Co.
green
2 sentences2019The court granted John Deere summary judgment on the implied warranty claim but held summary judgment was improper on the express warranty claim. 115 F. Supp. 3d at 1306 -07 . 2019The court noted Scottsdale had to "prove that the combine suffered from a defect in material or workmanship to prevail on its breach of express warranty claim." 115 F. Supp. 3d at 1308 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Dieker v. Case Corp.
green
2 sentences2019In Dieker v. Case Corp. , 276 Kan. 141 , 73 P.3d 133 (2003), buyers of a combine brought an implied warranty claim against the manufacturer of the combine after the combine caught on fire. 2019In Dieker v. Case Corp. , 276 Kan. 141 , 73 P.3d 133 (2003), buyers of a combine brought an implied warranty claim against the manufacturer of the combine after the combine caught on fire. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Black v. Don Schmid Motor, Inc.
green
1 sentence2012Based on that warranty, a buyer may reasonably expect an item to be something more than “worthless,” though not “the finest of all possible goods of that kind.” Black, 232 Kan. at 467 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Papas v. The Upjohn Company
green
1 sentence1994Papas 11, 985 F.2d at 519 . | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Nichols v. Nold
green
2 sentences1957We agree with defendant's statement that the questions of breach of an implied warranty and the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur were thoroughly discussed in Nichols v. Nold, 174 Kan. 613 , 258 P.2d 317 , but in our case we are concerned only with implied warranty. 1957We agree with defendant's statement that the questions of breach of an implied warranty and the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur were thoroughly discussed in Nichols v. Nold, 174 Kan. 613 , 258 P.2d 317 , but in our case we are concerned only with implied warranty. | 1 | 1957–1957 |
Kail v. Bell
green
1 sentence1933Our statute, above quoted, imposes other warranties, but here we are only concerned with the one that the instrument is genuine and in all respects what it purports to be, and, as stated in the contract, "that the notes are bona fide with genuine signatures.” In the case of Kaill v. Bell, 88 Kan. 666 , 129 Pac. 1135 , it was said: “Even in the case of commercial paper indorsed without recourse, the vendor impliedly warrants that the instrument is a valid obligation of the kind it purports to be.” (p. 668.) Such an indorser, under this statute and under the special contract in this case, become | 1 | 1933–1933 |
Busey v. Stockhoff
green
1 sentence1933Our statute, above quoted, imposes other warranties, but here we are only concerned with the one that the instrument is genuine and in all respects what it purports to be, and, as stated in the contract, "that the notes are bona fide with genuine signatures.” In the case of Kaill v. Bell, 88 Kan. 666 , 129 Pac. 1135 , it was said: “Even in the case of commercial paper indorsed without recourse, the vendor impliedly warrants that the instrument is a valid obligation of the kind it purports to be.” (p. 668.) Such an indorser, under this statute and under the special contract in this case, become | 1 | 1933–1933 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.