State cannot challenge (Kansas) · Go Syfert
← Kansas issues

State cannot challenge in Kansas

5 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2007 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Neal v. State green
kanctapp · 1998
2 sentences

2007Similarly, the State cannot challenge the severity level of petitioner's crime after so stipulating earlier. 25 Kan.App.2d at 705 .

2002Similarly, the State cannot challenge the severity level of petitioner’s crime after so stipulating earlier. [Citation omitted.]” Neal v. State, 25 Kan.

22002–2007
Washington v. State green
kanctapp · 1992
2 sentences

1993If the factfinder concludes upon remand that the State's legal duty under Restatement (Second) of Torts § 320 was breached, the State cannot claim immunity from liability under the provisions of 75-6104(e) by asserting the absence of standards or guidelines applicable to the handling of prisoners." 17 Kan.

1993If the factfinder concludes upon remand that the State’s legal duty under Restatement (Second) of Torts § 320 was breached, the State cannot claim immunity from liability under the provisions of 75-6104(e) by asserting the absence of standards or guidelines applicable to the handling of prisoners.” 17 Kan.

21993–1993
State v. Tolliver green
kanctapp · 1996
1 sentence

1998State v. Tolliver, 22 Kan.

11998–1998

Statutes the citing opinions construe

KS § K.S.A. § 22-3504 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TX 10 (1991–2018) IL 9 (1974–2014) MS 8 (1994–2023) CA 7 (1982–2019) NY 7 (1924–2017) KS 5 (1993–2007) IA 5 (2017–2021) FL 5 (1990–2006) MO 4 (1975–2017) OR 4 (1984–2017) OH 4 (2005–2020) GA 3 (1980–2009) WA 3 (1987–1994) OK 3 (1992–2018) MD 2 (1977–2010) NV 2 (1919–2012) MN 2 (1957–2015) TN 2 (1990–2011) SD 2 (2003–2017) AZ 2 (2016–2016) WI 2 (1991–2023) CT 2 (1994–2010) IN 2 (1979–2010)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check