State cannot bar (Florida) · Go Syfert
← Florida issues

State cannot bar in Florida

5 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1990–2006 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
McKoy v. North Carolinagreen
scotus · 1990 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
2 sentences

2006Thus, a State cannot bar "the consideration of . . . evidence if the sentencer could reasonably find that it warrants a sentence less than death." 494 U.S., at 441 [, 110 S.Ct. 1227 ].

2006Thus, a State cannot bar "the consideration of . . . evidence if the sentencer could reasonably find that it warrants a sentence less than death." 494 U.S., at 441 [, 110 S.Ct. 1227 ].

11
Eblin v. Stategreen
fladistctapp · 1996 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2004–2004
1 sentence

2004See Eblin v. State, 677 So.2d 388, 390 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996) ("The state cannot claim error in a ruling it invited the court to make.").

11
State v. Glossongreen
fla · 1985 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996
1 sentence

1996State v. Glosson, 462 So.2d 1082, 1084 (Fla. 1985).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
Saffle v. Parks green
scotus · 1990
2 sentences

1990Therefore, “the State cannot bar relevant mitigating evidence from being presented and considered during the penalty phase of a capital trial.” Saffle v. Parks, 494 U.S. 484 , 110 S.Ct. 1257, 1261 , 108 L.Ed.2d 415 (1990) (emphasis supplied).

1990Therefore, “the State cannot bar relevant mitigating evidence from being presented and considered during the penalty phase of a capital trial.” Saffle v. Parks, 494 U.S. 484 , 110 S.Ct. 1257, 1261 , 108 L.Ed.2d 415 (1990) (emphasis supplied).

21990–1990

Where else courts name it

TX 10 (1991–2018) IL 9 (1974–2014) MS 8 (1994–2023) CA 7 (1982–2019) NY 7 (1924–2017) KS 5 (1993–2007) IA 5 (2017–2021) FL 5 (1990–2006) MO 4 (1975–2017) OR 4 (1984–2017) OH 4 (2005–2020) GA 3 (1980–2009) WA 3 (1987–1994) OK 3 (1992–2018) MD 2 (1977–2010) NV 2 (1919–2012) MN 2 (1957–2015) TN 2 (1990–2011) SD 2 (2003–2017) AZ 2 (2016–2016) WI 2 (1991–2023) CT 2 (1994–2010) IN 2 (1979–2010)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check