Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Kansas opinions name it 1 courts 1907–1973 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Unified School District No. 255 v. Unified School District No. 254
neutral
2 sentences1973In the recent case of Unified School District No. 255 v. Unified School District No. 254, 204 Kan. 282 , 463 P. 2d 499 , we held: “The constitutionality of a statute is presumed, all doubts must be resolved in favor of its legality, and before it may be stricken down it must clearly appear the statute violates the constitution. 1973In the recent case of Unified School District No. 255 v. Unified School District No. 254, 204 Kan. 282 , 463 P. 2d 499 , we held: “The constitutionality of a statute is presumed, all doubts must be resolved in favor of its legality, and before it may be stricken down it must clearly appear the statute violates the constitution. | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Thompson v. Burge
neutral
2 sentences1931It was further held that this was within the principle announced in the second paragraph of the syllabus of Thompson v. Burge, 60 Kan. 549 , 57 Pac. 110 . 1931It was further held that this was within the principle announced in the second paragraph of the syllabus of Thompson v. Burge, 60 Kan. 549 , 57 Pac. 110 . | 1 | 1931–1931 |
Sparks v. Sparks
neutral
1 sentence1915(Black v. Funk, 93 Kan. 60 , 143 Pac. 426 ; Sparks v. Sparks, 51 Kan. 195 , 32 Pac. 892 ; 4 Wigmore on Evidence, § 2297.) Long was called as a witness by the plaintiff: and asked a number of questions which were objected to on the ground that they amounted to cross-examination. | 1 | 1915–1915 |
Black v. Funk
neutral
2 sentences1915(Black v. Funk, 93 Kan. 60 , 143 Pac. 426 ; Sparks v. Sparks, 51 Kan. 195 , 32 Pac. 892 ; 4 Wigmore on Evidence, § 2297.) Long was called as a witness by the plaintiff: and asked a number of questions which were objected to on the ground that they amounted to cross-examination. 1915(Black v. Funk, 93 Kan. 60 , 143 Pac. 426 ; Sparks v. Sparks, 51 Kan. 195 , 32 Pac. 892 ; 4 Wigmore on Evidence, § 2297.) Long was called as a witness by the plaintiff: and asked a number of questions which were objected to on the ground that they amounted to cross-examination. | 1 | 1915–1915 |
Troyer v. Beedy
neutral
1 sentence1911This is within the rule declared in Troyer v. Beedy, 79 Kan. 502 , and Gibson v. Branstool, supra. Upon the findings of fact the judgment should have been for the defendants for costs. | 1 | 1911–1911 |
Gibson v. Branstool
neutral
1 sentence1911This is within the rule declared in Troyer v. Beedy, 79 Kan. 502 , and Gibson v. Branstool, supra. Upon the findings of fact the judgment should have been for the defendants for costs. | 1 | 1911–1911 |
Lombard Water-Wheel Governor Co. v. Great Northern Paper Co.
neutral
2 sentences1907A recent case in point is Lombard Co. v. Paper Co., 101 Me. 114 , 63 Atl. 555 , 6 L. 1907A recent case in point is Lombard Co. v. Paper Co., 101 Me. 114 , 63 Atl. 555 , 6 L. | 1 | 1907–1907 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.