5 Kentucky opinions name it 2 courts 1914–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kentucky courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kentucky. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kentucky. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Crawford v. Washington
green
2 sentences2010The Clause does not bar admission of a statement so long as the declarant is present at trial to defend or explain it." Id. at 59 , 124 S.Ct. 1354 (citation omitted). 2010The Clause does not bar admission of a statement so long as the declarant is present at trial to defend or explain it.” Id. at 59 , 124 S.Ct. 1354 (citation omitted). | 3 | 2006–2013 |
Hartsfield v. Commonwealth
green
2 sentences2010The Clause does not bar admission of a statement so long as the declarant is present at trial to defend or explain it." Id. at 59 , 124 S.Ct. 1354 (citation omitted). 2010The Clause does not bar admission of a statement so long as the declarant is present at trial to defend or explain it.” Id. at 59 , 124 S.Ct. 1354 (citation omitted). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Moore v. Hart
green
2 sentences1924This instruction should also be amended with reference to the defendant’s duty in the matter of the speed at which he was operating his car, as is directed in the case of Moore v. Hart, 171 Ky. 725 , 188 S. W. 861 . 1924This instruction should also be amended with reference to the defendant’s duty in the matter of the speed at which he was operating his car, as is directed in the case of Moore v. Hart, 171 Ky. 725 , 188 S. W. 861 . | 1 | 1924–1924 |
Harvey v. Bell
green
1 sentence1914But the fact that the wife of William N. Carr survived him and that her life estate intervened before John William Carr came into possession of the title, open up this clause to the rule of construction frequently announced by this court, that where there is a devise of property to one, with a provision that in ease he died! without issue, it shall ge to others, these words will be construed to refer not to a failure of issue at any time, but to a failure of issue at the termination of some period, if there is any such named in the will, to which it may be referred, and the will is susceptible | 1 | 1914–1914 |
Bradshaw v. Williams
neutral
1 sentence1914R., 1243; Bradshaw v. Williams, 140 Ky., 160 ; Simpson v. Adams, 127 Ky., 190 . | 1 | 1914–1914 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.