Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Oklahoma opinions name it 2 courts 1938–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Crawford v. Washingtongreen2 sentences2011Andrew v. State, 2007 OK CR 23, ¶ 31 , 164 P.3d 176, 189 (" Crawford does not bar the use of testimonial statements for purposes other than establishing the truth of the matter asserted."); Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 , 59 n. 9, 124 S.Ct. 1354 , 1369 n. 9, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004) ("The Clause also does not bar the use of testimonial statements for purposes other than establishing the truth of the matter asserted."); Tennessee v. Street, 471 U.S. 409, 414 , 105 S.Ct. 2078, 2081-82 , 85 L.Ed.2d 425 (1985) (The nonhearsay aspect of the codefendant's confession-not to prove what happened at 2011Andrew v. State, 2007 OK CR 23, ¶ 31 , 164 P.3d 176, 189 (" Crawford does not bar the use of testimonial statements for purposes other than establishing the truth of the matter asserted."); Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 , 59 n. 9, 124 S.Ct. 1354 , 1369 n. 9, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004) ("The Clause also does not bar the use of testimonial statements for purposes other than establishing the truth of the matter asserted."); Tennessee v. Street, 471 U.S. 409, 414 , 105 S.Ct. 2078, 2081-82 , 85 L.Ed.2d 425 (1985) (The nonhearsay aspect of the codefendant's confession-not to prove what happened at | 3 | 3 |
Tennessee v. Streetgreen2 sentences2011Andrew v. State, 2007 OK CR 23, ¶ 31 , 164 P.3d 176, 189 (" Crawford does not bar the use of testimonial statements for purposes other than establishing the truth of the matter asserted."); Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 , 59 n. 9, 124 S.Ct. 1354 , 1369 n. 9, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004) ("The Clause also does not bar the use of testimonial statements for purposes other than establishing the truth of the matter asserted."); Tennessee v. Street, 471 U.S. 409, 414 , 105 S.Ct. 2078, 2081-82 , 85 L.Ed.2d 425 (1985) (The nonhearsay aspect of the codefendant's confession-not to prove what happened at 2011Andrew v. State, 2007 OK CR 23, ¶ 31 , 164 P.3d 176, 189 (" Crawford does not bar the use of testimonial statements for purposes other than establishing the truth of the matter asserted."); Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 , 59 n. 9, 124 S.Ct. 1354 , 1369 n. 9, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004) ("The Clause also does not bar the use of testimonial statements for purposes other than establishing the truth of the matter asserted."); Tennessee v. Street, 471 U.S. 409, 414 , 105 S.Ct. 2078, 2081-82 , 85 L.Ed.2d 425 (1985) (The nonhearsay aspect of the codefendant's confession-not to prove what happened at | 1 | 2 |
Andrew v. Stategreen2 sentences2011Andrew v. State, 2007 OK CR 23, ¶ 31 , 164 P.3d 176, 189 (" Crawford does not bar the use of testimonial statements for purposes other than establishing the truth of the matter asserted."); Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 , 59 n. 9, 124 S.Ct. 1354 , 1369 n. 9, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004) ("The Clause also does not bar the use of testimonial statements for purposes other than establishing the truth of the matter asserted."); Tennessee v. Street, 471 U.S. 409, 414 , 105 S.Ct. 2078, 2081-82 , 85 L.Ed.2d 425 (1985) (The nonhearsay aspect of the codefendant's confession-not to prove what happened at 2011Andrew v. State, 2007 OK CR 23, ¶ 31 , 164 P.3d 176, 189 (" Crawford does not bar the use of testimonial statements for purposes other than establishing the truth of the matter asserted."); Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 , 59 n. 9, 124 S.Ct. 1354 , 1369 n. 9, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004) ("The Clause also does not bar the use of testimonial statements for purposes other than establishing the truth of the matter asserted."); Tennessee v. Street, 471 U.S. 409, 414 , 105 S.Ct. 2078, 2081-82 , 85 L.Ed.2d 425 (1985) (The nonhearsay aspect of the codefendant's confession-not to prove what happened at | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State Ex Rel. Town of Pryor v. Williamson
green
2 sentences2015First, it relied in part on son, 1959 OK 207 , 347 P.2d 204 , which is discredited. 2015First, it relied in part on son, 1959 OK 207 , 347 P.2d 204 , which is discredited. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Coursey v. Fairchild
green
2 sentences1983Coursey v. Fairchild, supra, and Rives v. Mincks Hotel Co., 167 Okl. 500 , 30 P.2d 911 [1934], A mortgage provision by which any incident of the borrower’s title is surrendered— however slightly — to the will of the lender — directly or obliquely — must be deemed to contravene all the basic concepts applied in equity to a land security transaction. 1983Coursey v. Fairchild, supra, and Rives v. Mincks Hotel Co., 167 Okl. 500 , 30 P.2d 911 [1934]. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Rives v. Mincks Hotel Co.
green
2 sentences1983Coursey v. Fairchild, supra, and Rives v. Mincks Hotel Co., 167 Okl. 500 , 30 P.2d 911 [1934]. 1983Coursey v. Fairchild, supra, and Rives v. Mincks Hotel Co., 167 Okl. 500 , 30 P.2d 911 [1934]. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Brown v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.
neutral
1 sentence1938Co., supra, involved a cancellation clause, and upon close examination it appears that the clause in the policy was materially different from the clause in the standard form. | 1 | 1938–1938 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.