5 Kentucky opinions name it 2 courts 2019–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kentucky courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Benhamgreen2 sentences2019KRS 218A.1415(l)(c) provides that “a person is guilty of possession of a controlled substance in the first degree when he or she knowingly or unlawfully possesses . . . [m]ethamphetamine[.]” Similarly, KRS 218A.500(l) and (2) make it unlawful for any person to possess with intent to use drug paraphernalia, which is defined in part to mean “all equipment, products and materials of any kind which are used, intended for use, or designed for use in . . . inhaling, or 1 816 S.W.2d 186, 187 (Ky. 1991). 2 Id. (citing Commonwealth v. Sawhill, 660 S.W.2d 3, 5 (Ky. 1983)). 3 Id. (citing Sawhill, 660 S.W 2019KRS 218A.1415(l)(c) provides that “a person is guilty of possession of a controlled substance in the first degree when he or she knowingly or unlawfully possesses . . . [m]ethamphetamine[.]” Similarly, KRS 218A.500(l) and (2) make it unlawful for any person to possess with intent to use drug paraphernalia, which is defined in part to mean “all equipment, products and materials of any kind which are used, intended for use, or designed for use in . . . inhaling, or 1 816 S.W.2d 186, 187 (Ky. 1991). 2 Id. (citing Commonwealth v. Sawhill, 660 S.W.2d 3, 5 (Ky. 1983)). 3 Id. (citing Sawhill, 660 S.W | 2 | 2 |
Commonwealth v. Sawhillgreen2 sentences2019KRS 218A.1415(l)(c) provides that “a person is guilty of possession of a controlled substance in the first degree when he or she knowingly or unlawfully possesses . . . [m]ethamphetamine[.]” Similarly, KRS 218A.500(l) and (2) make it unlawful for any person to possess with intent to use drug paraphernalia, which is defined in part to mean “all equipment, products and materials of any kind which are used, intended for use, or designed for use in . . . inhaling, or 1 816 S.W.2d 186, 187 (Ky. 1991). 2 Id. (citing Commonwealth v. Sawhill, 660 S.W.2d 3, 5 (Ky. 1983)). 3 Id. (citing Sawhill, 660 S.W 2019KRS 218A.1415(l)(c) provides that “a person is guilty of possession of a controlled substance in the first degree when he or she knowingly or unlawfully possesses . . . [m]ethamphetamine[.]” Similarly, KRS 218A.500(l) and (2) make it unlawful for any person to possess with intent to use drug paraphernalia, which is defined in part to mean “all equipment, products and materials of any kind which are used, intended for use, or designed for use in . . . inhaling, or 1 816 S.W.2d 186, 187 (Ky. 1991). 2 Id. (citing Commonwealth v. Sawhill, 660 S.W.2d 3, 5 (Ky. 1983)). 3 Id. (citing Sawhill, 660 S.W | 2 | 2 |
Pate v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences2025As to -4- the first-degree trafficking and possession of drug paraphernalia charges, KRS4 218A.1415(1)(c) provides that “[a] person is guilty of possession of a controlled substance in the first degree when he or she knowingly and unlawfully possesses . . . [m]ethamphetamine[.]” Similarly, KRS 218A.500(1) and (2) make it unlawful for any person to possess with intent to use drug paraphernalia, which is defined in part to mean “all equipment, products and materials of any kind which are used, intended for use, or designed for use in . . . inhaling, or otherwise introducing into the human body a 2025Additionally, “‘possession’ for purposes of KRS Chapter 218A includes both actual and constructive possession.” Id. (citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Brewer v. Commonwealthgreen1 sentence2021In Osborne, we began by noting that KRS 218A.410(1)(j) permits forfeiture of “[e]verything of value furnished . . . in exchange for a controlled substance in violation of this chapter, all proceeds . . . traceable to the exchange, and all moneys ... used, or intended to be used to facilitate any violation of this 2 See also Brewer v. Commonwealth, 206 S.W.3d 313, 327 (Ky. 2006); Hill v. Commonwealth, 308 S.W.3d 227 (Ky. App. 2010); Cf. Sexton v. Sexton, 125 S.W.3d 258 (Ky. 2004) (finding family court’s determination that marital property presumption was successfully rebutted was not clearly er | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kentucky. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
McClure v. Commonwealth
green
1 sentence2022In response to this increased supervision, he went to great lengths to undermine the efforts of those supervising him by carrying someone else’s urine in a syringe concealed in his pants. -11- Id. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Bjelland v. Bjelland
green
1 sentence2021In Osborne, we began by noting that KRS 218A.410(1)(j) permits forfeiture of “[e]verything of value furnished . . . in exchange for a controlled substance in violation of this chapter, all proceeds . . . traceable to the exchange, and all moneys ... used, or intended to be used to facilitate any violation of this 2 See also Brewer v. Commonwealth, 206 S.W.3d 313, 327 (Ky. 2006); Hill v. Commonwealth, 308 S.W.3d 227 (Ky. App. 2010); Cf. Sexton v. Sexton, 125 S.W.3d 258 (Ky. 2004) (finding family court’s determination that marital property presumption was successfully rebutted was not clearly er | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Hill v. Commonwealth
green
1 sentence2021In Osborne, we began by noting that KRS 218A.410(1)(j) permits forfeiture of “[e]verything of value furnished . . . in exchange for a controlled substance in violation of this chapter, all proceeds . . . traceable to the exchange, and all moneys ... used, or intended to be used to facilitate any violation of this 2 See also Brewer v. Commonwealth, 206 S.W.3d 313, 327 (Ky. 2006); Hill v. Commonwealth, 308 S.W.3d 227 (Ky. App. 2010); Cf. Sexton v. Sexton, 125 S.W.3d 258 (Ky. 2004) (finding family court’s determination that marital property presumption was successfully rebutted was not clearly er | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Sexton v. Sexton
green
1 sentence2021In Osborne, we began by noting that KRS 218A.410(1)(j) permits forfeiture of “[e]verything of value furnished . . . in exchange for a controlled substance in violation of this chapter, all proceeds . . . traceable to the exchange, and all moneys ... used, or intended to be used to facilitate any violation of this 2 See also Brewer v. Commonwealth, 206 S.W.3d 313, 327 (Ky. 2006); Hill v. Commonwealth, 308 S.W.3d 227 (Ky. App. 2010); Cf. Sexton v. Sexton, 125 S.W.3d 258 (Ky. 2004) (finding family court’s determination that marital property presumption was successfully rebutted was not clearly er | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.