5 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1996–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Bashgreen1 sentence2020Discussion To show a defendant unlawfully possessed a controlled substance in violation of section 124.401(5), the State must show “that the defendant: (1) exercised dominion and control over the contraband, (2) had knowledge of its presence, and (3) had knowledge that the material was a controlled substance.” State v. Bash, 670 N.W.2d 135, 137 (Iowa 2003). | 1 | 1 |
Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. Ronwingreen1 sentence2019Prof'l Conduct 32:8.4(b). | 1 | 1 |
Hills v. Iowa Department of Transportation & Motor Vehicle Divisiongreen1 sentence2015See Hills v. Iowa Dep’t of Transp., 534 N.W.2d 640, 642 (Iowa 1997) (holding license revocation based on a controlled substance violation was a quasi-criminal punishment rather than a civil consequence). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Speichergreen2 sentences2013See State v. Speicher, 625 N.W.2d 738, 741 (Iowa 2001) (discussing the relationship between Iowa’s controlled substance statute, Iowa Code section 124.401, and Iowa’s conspiracy statute, Iowa Code section 706.1). 2013See State v. Speicher, 625 N.W.2d 738, 741 (Iowa 2001) (discussing the relationship between Iowa’s controlled substance statute, Iowa Code section 124.401, and Iowa’s conspiracy statute, Iowa Code section 706.1). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Taggartgreen1 sentence1996See State v. Taggart, 186 Iowa 247, 254 , 172 N.W. 299 , 301 (1919) (ex post facto protections apply only to penal and criminal actions, not civil actions). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.