Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Arkansas opinions name it 1 courts 1995–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Cave v. State
neutral
1 sentence2024Ownership of the dwelling is not an element of the crime.17 Pettis testified that Cantrell lived in the residence 13 Reynolds v. State, 2017 Ark. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Coger v. State
green
1 sentence2018Id. *519 A person is subject to enhanced sentencing of an additional 10-year term of imprisonment if the person "[p]ossesses a controlled substance in violation of § 5-64-419 and the offense is a Class C felony or greater" and "[t]he offense is committed on or within" 1000 feet of the real property of a church. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Curtis v. State
green
2 sentences2017Arkansas Code Annotated section 5-64—402(a)(2) provides that it is unlawful for any person “knowingly to keep or maintain any store, shop, warehouse, dwelling, building, or other structure or place or premise that is resorted to by a person for the purpose of using or obtaining a controlled substance in violation of this chapter or that is used for keeping a controlled substance in violation of this chapter.” In Curtis v. State, 2015 Ark. 2017App. 167 , 457 S.W.3d 700 , we held that evidence was sufficient to support a conviction for maintaining a drug premises where the confidential informant testified that the appellant lived in the trailer, that the informant gave the appellant money in the living room of the trailer, and that the appellant then went to a bedroom and removed methamphetamine from a larger bag and placed it into a smaller bag and gave it to the informant. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Kimbrell v. State
green
1 sentence2016The court determined that Kimbrell’s drug use during his probationary period “could have resulted in his probation being 3 Cite as 2016 Ark. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Franklin v. State
green
2 sentences2008Ark.Code Ann. § 5-64-402(a)(2) (Supp.2005); 60 Ark.App. 198 , 962 S.W.2d 370 (1998). 2008Ark.Code Ann. § 5-64-402(a)(2) (Supp.2005); 60 Ark.App. 198 , 962 S.W.2d 370 (1998). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Gallia v. State
green
2 sentences1995Gallia v. State, 287 Ark. 176 , 697 S.W.2d 108 (1985). 1995Gallia v. State, 287 Ark. 176 , 697 S.W.2d 108 (1985). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.