child support claim (Louisiana) · Go Syfert
← Louisiana issues

child support claim in Louisiana

5 Louisiana opinions name it 1 courts 1978–2018 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Curet v. Curetgreen
lactapp · 2002 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003
1 sentence

2003See Curet v. Curet, 02-212 (La.App. 5 Cir. 6/26/02) , 823 So.2d 971 .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Lebouef v. Liner green
lactapp · 1981
2 sentences

2018The trial court invalidated the child support clause of the agreement; however, it retained the remainder of the agreement finding the agreement was "based upon other substantial consideration." Id.

2018The trial court invalidated the child support clause of the agreement; however, it retained the remainder of the agreement finding the agreement was "based upon other substantial consideration." Id.

22018–2018
Hirsch v. Hirsch neutral
lactapp · 1979
1 sentence

1992John asserts that this court’s decision in Hirsch v. Hirsch, 378 So.2d 539 (La.App. 4th Cir.1980) prohibits the use of the Long Arm Statute to obtain jurisdiction in a child support rule.

11992–1992
Wainwright v. Wainwright green
la · 1950
2 sentences

1978The second and more recent case is Wainwright v. Wainwright, 217 La. 563 , 46 So.2d 902 (1950), wherein attorney fees were disallowed in a suit to recover accrued alimony and to increase the amount of future alimony.

1978The second and more recent case is Wainwright v. Wainwright, 217 La. 563 , 46 So.2d 902 (1950), wherein attorney fees were disallowed in a suit to recover accrued alimony and to increase the amount of future alimony.

11978–1978

Where else courts name it

PA 16 (1994–2025) OH 10 (1992–2025) CA 7 (1983–2024) FL 7 (1983–2009) TX 6 (2002–2020) VA 6 (1991–2016) NC 5 (2014–2024) NY 5 (1998–2025) IL 5 (1990–2025) LA 5 (1978–2018) GA 5 (1979–2018) AL 5 (1995–2024) AZ 4 (1995–2020) NJ 4 (1997–2022) NM 3 (2009–2024) NE 3 (2003–2014) WY 3 (2005–2023) MD 3 (1973–2021) ND 2 (2000–2018) DC 2 (1998–2008) IA 2 (1985–2015) CO 2 (1990–2019) KY 2 (2005–2005) AK 2 (1993–2007) WV 2 (1986–1989)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check