child support hearing in Ohio

2015No. 11 HA 4, 2012-Ohio-2820, ¶11 . ‘The court may choose to award child support from the 4 date of the child’s birth, the date of the motion requesting child support, the date of the child support hearing, or any other appropriate date.’ Id.” Soukup, supra, at ¶21 . {¶14} In this matter, the juvenile court addressed Ms. Nevins’ request for retroactive child support in its December 23, 2014 judgment as follows: {¶15} “Defendant’s request for child support for the period prior to September 1, 2013 is denied.

2013“The court may choose to award child support from the date of the child’s birth, the date of the motion requesting child support, the date of the child support hearing, or any other appropriate date.” Id. {¶22} Here, there is no indication appellant ever sought a retroactive support order.

2004Connin v. Bailey (1984), 15 Ohio St.3d 34, 35-36 , 15 OBR 134, 472 N.E.2d 328 ; Smith v. Smith (1959), 168 Ohio St. 447 , 7 O.O.2d 276 , 156 N.E.2d 113 , paragraph three of the syllabus.

2004Connin v. Bailey (1984), 15 Ohio St.3d 34, 35-36 , 15 OBR 134, 472 N.E.2d 328 ; Smith v. Smith (1959), 168 Ohio St. 447 , 7 O.O.2d 276 , 156 N.E.2d 113 , paragraph three of the syllabus.

2025Tarter at ¶ 17, citing Ohio Valley Radiology Associates, 28 Ohio St. 3d 118, 124-125 , (1986). {¶ 20} The fact that R.C. 3111.13(C) applies to both paternity and child support -6- Preble CA2025-04-003 orders does not imply that a party has received notice that both issues may be addressed at a hearing.

2015No. 11 HA 4, 2012-Ohio-2820, ¶11 . ‘The court may choose to award child support from the 4 date of the child’s birth, the date of the motion requesting child support, the date of the child support hearing, or any other appropriate date.’ Id.” Soukup, supra, at ¶21 . {¶14} In this matter, the juvenile court addressed Ms. Nevins’ request for retroactive child support in its December 23, 2014 judgment as follows: {¶15} “Defendant’s request for child support for the period prior to September 1, 2013 is denied.

2012See, e.g., Beach v. Poole, 111 Ohio App.3d 710, 712 , 676 N.E.2d 1254 (5th Dist.1996) (trial court may, but is not required, to order retroactive child support to the date of the child's birth); Murphy v. Murphy, 13 Ohio App.3d 388, 389 , -5- 469 N.E.2d 564 (10th Dist.1984) (trial court has discretion to order retroactive child support from the date of motion to increase support); Shonebarger v. Nelson, 12th Dist.

2012See, e.g., Beach v. Poole, 111 Ohio App.3d 710, 712 , 676 N.E.2d 1254 (5th Dist.1996) (trial court may, but is not required, to order retroactive child support to the date of the child's birth); Murphy v. Murphy, 13 Ohio App.3d 388, 389 , -5- 469 N.E.2d 564 (10th Dist.1984) (trial court has discretion to order retroactive child support from the date of motion to increase support); Shonebarger v. Nelson, 12th Dist.

2005As an example, we stated in Frost that "if a child support hearing is held in November, the `gross income' calculation would include the proportionate income from November and December of the previous year and January through the date of the hearing of the year in which the hearing is held." Id.

1999Id. at 840 .

1998Elliot's testimony that appellant's statement greatly altered her child support obligations provides sufficient evidence that appellant's statement was material. "[A]n appellate court's function when reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a criminal conviction is to examine the evidence admitted at trial to determine whether such evidence, if believed, would convince the average mind of the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt." State v. Jenks (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 259 , 273 .