Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Louisiana opinions name it 1 courts 1992–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ivan I. Smith, Jr. and Gloria G. Smith v. Kimberly L. Robinson, Secretary of the Department of Revenue, State of Louisiana
neutral
2 sentences2019App. 4 Cir. 3/27/19), 267 So.3d 655 , 660 as follows: Summary judgments are reviewed de novo one appeal, with the reviewing court using the same criteria that govern the trial court's determination of whether summary judgment is appropriate; whether there is any genuine issue of material fact, and whether the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law." Smith v. Robinson , [20] 18-0728, p. 5 (La. 12/5/18), 265 So.3d 740 , 744, 2018 WL 6382118 , (citing La. 2019App. 4 Cir. 3/27/19), 267 So.3d 655 , 660 as follows: Summary judgments are reviewed de novo one appeal, with the reviewing court using the same criteria that govern the trial court's determination of whether summary judgment is appropriate; whether there is any genuine issue of material fact, and whether the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law." Smith v. Robinson , [20] 18-0728, p. 5 (La. 12/5/18), 265 So.3d 740 , 744, 2018 WL 6382118 , (citing La. | 2 | 2019–2019 |
SBN V FNBC LLC v. Vista La., LLC
green
2 sentences2019App. 4 Cir. 3/27/19), 267 So.3d 655 , 660 as follows: Summary judgments are reviewed de novo one appeal, with the reviewing court using the same criteria that govern the trial court's determination of whether summary judgment is appropriate; whether there is any genuine issue of material fact, and whether the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law." Smith v. Robinson , [20] 18-0728, p. 5 (La. 12/5/18), 265 So.3d 740 , 744, 2018 WL 6382118 , (citing La. 2019App. 4 Cir. 3/27/19), 267 So.3d 655 , 660 as follows: Summary judgments are reviewed de novo one appeal, with the reviewing court using the same criteria that govern the trial court's determination of whether summary judgment is appropriate; whether there is any genuine issue of material fact, and whether the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law." Smith v. Robinson , [20] 18-0728, p. 5 (La. 12/5/18), 265 So.3d 740 , 744, 2018 WL 6382118 , (citing La. | 2 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Jones
green
2 sentences2001State v. Jones, 474 So.2d 919 (La. 1985). 2000State v. Jones, 474 So.2d 919 (La.1985). | 2 | 2000–2001 |
Adams v. Chevron USA, Inc.
green
1 sentence1992Viewing the record evidence in light of the delineated inquiry espoused in Adams, supra, we cannot say that the trial court was clearly erroneous in its acceptance of Paul Hogan as an expert in the field of child supervision on the playground. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.