faulty instruction (Louisiana) · Go Syfert
← Louisiana issues

faulty instruction in Louisiana

5 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1979–2005 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Martin v. Comm-Care Corp.green
la · 2004 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005
1 sentence

2005See also Martin v. Comm-Care Corporation d/b/a Community Care Center of Ruston, 03-3188 (La.2/6/04), 866 So.2d 225 , in which Justice Calogero again dissented from a writ denial, stating: "I continue to believe that the majority resolution of this prescription issue in LeBreton v. Rabito, 97-2221 (La.7/8/98), 714 So.2d 1226 , was wrong and that application of the faulty analysis in LeBreton serves in this case to cause a near-unconscionable result denying the rights of the survivors of the deceased asserted-victim of malpractice." While LeBreton attempted to clarify the law with regard to qual

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
LeBreton v. Rabito green
la · 1998
2 sentences

2005See also Martin v. Comm-Care Corporation d/b/a Community Care Center of Ruston, 03-3188 (La.2/6/04), 866 So.2d 225 , in which Justice Calogero again dissented from a writ denial, stating: "I continue to believe that the majority resolution of this prescription issue in LeBreton v. Rabito, 97-2221 (La.7/8/98), 714 So.2d 1226 , was wrong and that application of the faulty analysis in LeBreton serves in this case to cause a near-unconscionable result denying the rights of the survivors of the deceased asserted-victim of malpractice." While LeBreton attempted to clarify the law with regard to qual

2004I continue to believe that the majority's resolution of this prescription issue in LeBreton v. Rabito, 97-2221 (La.7/8/98), 714 So.2d 1226 , was wrong and that application of the faulty analysis in LeBreton serves in this case to cause a near-unconscionable result denying the rights of the survivors of the deceased asserted-victim of malpractice.

22004–2005
Gunn v. Amica Mut. Ins. Co. green
lactapp · 1992
1 sentence

1995Gunn v. Amica, supra. This is not a situation where the district court completely omitted a necessary instruction or gave a completely wrong charge; such cases usually result in de novo review.

11995–1995
Doyle v. Picadilly Cafeterias green
lactapp · 1991
1 sentence

1995Doyle v. Picadilly Cafeterias, supra. We look to the instructions as a whole and to the totality of the circumstances to determine whether the faulty instruction tainted the verdict.

11995–1995
Sullivan v. Louisiana green
scotus · 1993
2 sentences

1993Our ruling in Dobson must be reconsidered in light of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Sullivan v. Louisiana, ___ U.S. ___, 113 S.Ct. 2078 , 124 L.Ed.2d 182 (1993).

1993Our ruling in Dobson must be reconsidered in light of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Sullivan v. Louisiana, ___ U.S. ___, 113 S.Ct. 2078 , 124 L.Ed.2d 182 (1993).

11993–1993
State v. Stewart neutral
la · 1976
1 sentence

1979This Court has held that the unconstitutionality of a statute upon which a prosecution is based is a patent error, State v. Stewart, 325 So.2d 828 (La.1976), but it cannot be said that the prosecution here was so based simply because a single jury instruction was based *1350 upon an interpretation of the first and second degree murder statutes which we have held to be unconstitutional.

11979–1979

Where else courts name it

IL 29 (1931–2025) FL 25 (1903–2018) MO 20 (1976–2022) CA 11 (1994–2024) PA 10 (1989–2020) SD 10 (1996–2014) WA 8 (2002–2012) OH 6 (1993–2020) MI 5 (2002–2022) CO 5 (1999–2021) TX 5 (1989–2017) IN 5 (1885–2019) LA 5 (1979–2005) AZ 4 (2001–2023) UT 4 (1992–2019) IA 3 (2012–2021) GA 3 (2000–2011) KY 3 (1944–2024) MA 3 (1974–2001) VT 2 (1999–2011) MD 2 (1976–1999) ID 2 (1986–2008) KS 2 (1997–2024) WY 2 (1989–1990) SC 2 (1962–1967) MN 2 (1984–2015) OK 2 (1936–2018)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check