Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Colorado opinions name it 1 courts 1999–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kinard v. Coats Company, Inc.green2 sentences2013Kinard v. Coats Co., 37 Colo.App. 555, 558 , 553 P.2d 835, 838 (1976). 174 Further, we. conclude that this case does not present the exceptional cireumstances that would justify the application of the plain error doctrine in a civil case. "[Pllain error review of instructional issues is restricted to unusual or special cases, and, even then, reversal occurs only when necessary to avert unequivocal and manifest Justice." Harris Grp., 209 P.3d at 1195. ‘ V. - The Insurance Company Has Withdrawn Its Argument that Sections 10-83-1115 and -1116 Do Not Apply 'to Liability Policies ‘ 175 Interpreting 2013Kinard v. Coats Co., 37 Colo.App. 555, 558 , 553 P.2d 835, 838 (1976). 174 Further, we. conclude that this case does not present the exceptional cireumstances that would justify the application of the plain error doctrine in a civil case. "[Pllain error review of instructional issues is restricted to unusual or special cases, and, even then, reversal occurs only when necessary to avert unequivocal and manifest Justice." Harris Grp., 209 P.3d at 1195. ‘ V. - The Insurance Company Has Withdrawn Its Argument that Sections 10-83-1115 and -1116 Do Not Apply 'to Liability Policies ‘ 175 Interpreting | 1 | 2 |
Harris Group, Inc. v. Robinsongreen1 sentence2013Kinard v. Coats Co., 37 Colo.App. 555, 558 , 553 P.2d 835, 838 (1976). 174 Further, we. conclude that this case does not present the exceptional cireumstances that would justify the application of the plain error doctrine in a civil case. "[Pllain error review of instructional issues is restricted to unusual or special cases, and, even then, reversal occurs only when necessary to avert unequivocal and manifest Justice." Harris Grp., 209 P.3d at 1195. ‘ V. - The Insurance Company Has Withdrawn Its Argument that Sections 10-83-1115 and -1116 Do Not Apply 'to Liability Policies ‘ 175 Interpreting | 1 | 1 |
People v. Roygreen1 sentence1999To constitute plain error, a faulty instruction must have “so undermined the fundamental fairness of the trial that it casts serious doubt on the reliability of the verdict.” People v. Roy, 948 P.2d 99, 102 (Colo.App.1997). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Hoggard
green
1 sentence2021We conclude that the reliability of the judgment of conviction is in serious doubt and determine that the error is plain. ¶ 30 We acknowledge the People’s argument that under People v. Hoggard, 2017 COA 88 , aff’d on other grounds, 2020 CO 54 , no reversal is required where the faulty instruction did not prejudice the defendant. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
v. People
green
1 sentence2021We conclude that the reliability of the judgment of conviction is in serious doubt and determine that the error is plain. ¶ 30 We acknowledge the People’s argument that under People v. Hoggard, 2017 COA 88 , aff’d on other grounds, 2020 CO 54 , no reversal is required where the faulty instruction did not prejudice the defendant. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
People v. Garcia
green
1 sentence2005Peo *131 ple v. Garcia, 28 P.3d 340 (Colo.2001). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.