second multiple offender hearing (Louisiana) · Go Syfert
← Louisiana issues

second multiple offender hearing in Louisiana

5 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2000 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Dortheygreen
la · 1993 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2000–2000
1 sentence

2000State v. Langendorfer, 389 So.2d 1271 (La.1980); State v. Picot, 98-2194 (La.App. 4 Cir. 11/10/98) , 724 So.2d 236 ; see also State v. Dorthey, 623 So.2d 1276 (La.1993).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (13)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Langendorfer green
la · 1980
2 sentences

2000State v. Langendorfer, 389 So.2d 1271 (La.1980); State v. Picot, 98-2194 (La.App. 4 Cir. 11/10/98) , 724 So.2d 236 ; see also State v. Dorthey, 623 So.2d 1276 (La.1993).

1989The basis for such holding is set forth in State v. Langendorfer, supra, as follows: "It is contended that the second multiple offender hearing placed defendant twice in jeopardy as a multiple offender.

21989–2000
State v. Sanders green
la · 1976
2 sentences

1989State v. Jackson, 298 So.2d 777 (La., 1974); State v. Montana, 332 So.2d 248 (La., 1976); State v. Alexander, 325 So.2d 777 (La., 1976); State v. Sanders, 337 So.2d 1131 (La., 1976)." We have been referred to the recently decided case of Lockhart v. Nelson, ___ U.S. ___, 109 S.Ct. 285 , 102 L.Ed.2d 265 (1988).

1980State v. Jackson, 298 So.2d 777 (La., 1974); State v. Montana, 332 So.2d 248 (La., 1976); State v. Alexander, 325 So.2d 777 (La., 1976); State v. Sanders, 337 So.2d 1131 (La., 1976).

21980–1989
State v. Alexander green
la · 1976
2 sentences

1989State v. Jackson, 298 So.2d 777 (La., 1974); State v. Montana, 332 So.2d 248 (La., 1976); State v. Alexander, 325 So.2d 777 (La., 1976); State v. Sanders, 337 So.2d 1131 (La., 1976)." We have been referred to the recently decided case of Lockhart v. Nelson, ___ U.S. ___, 109 S.Ct. 285 , 102 L.Ed.2d 265 (1988).

1980State v. Jackson, 298 So.2d 777 (La., 1974); State v. Montana, 332 So.2d 248 (La., 1976); State v. Alexander, 325 So.2d 777 (La., 1976); State v. Sanders, 337 So.2d 1131 (La., 1976).

21980–1989
State v. Montana neutral
la · 1976
2 sentences

1989State v. Jackson, 298 So.2d 777 (La., 1974); State v. Montana, 332 So.2d 248 (La., 1976); State v. Alexander, 325 So.2d 777 (La., 1976); State v. Sanders, 337 So.2d 1131 (La., 1976)." We have been referred to the recently decided case of Lockhart v. Nelson, ___ U.S. ___, 109 S.Ct. 285 , 102 L.Ed.2d 265 (1988).

1980State v. Jackson, 298 So.2d 777 (La., 1974); State v. Montana, 332 So.2d 248 (La., 1976); State v. Alexander, 325 So.2d 777 (La., 1976); State v. Sanders, 337 So.2d 1131 (La., 1976).

21980–1989
State v. Jackson green
la · 1974
2 sentences

1989State v. Jackson, 298 So.2d 777 (La., 1974); State v. Montana, 332 So.2d 248 (La., 1976); State v. Alexander, 325 So.2d 777 (La., 1976); State v. Sanders, 337 So.2d 1131 (La., 1976)." We have been referred to the recently decided case of Lockhart v. Nelson, ___ U.S. ___, 109 S.Ct. 285 , 102 L.Ed.2d 265 (1988).

1980State v. Jackson, 298 So.2d 777 (La., 1974); State v. Montana, 332 So.2d 248 (La., 1976); State v. Alexander, 325 So.2d 777 (La., 1976); State v. Sanders, 337 So.2d 1131 (La., 1976).

21980–1989
State v. Picot green
lactapp · 1998
1 sentence

2000State v. Langendorfer, 389 So.2d 1271 (La.1980); State v. Picot, 98-2194 (La.App. 4 Cir. 11/10/98) , 724 So.2d 236 ; see also State v. Dorthey, 623 So.2d 1276 (La.1993).

12000–2000
State v. Langlois green
lactapp · 1997
1 sentence

1998In State v. Langlois, 96-0084 (La.App. 4th Cir. 5/21/97), 695 So.2d 540 , writ granted on other grounds and remanded, 97-1491 (La.11/14/97), 703 So.2d 1281 , the defendant, whose first multiple offender adjudication had been vacated, argued that the fifteen- to seventeen-month delay in holding a second multiple offender hearing was unreasonable.

11998–1998
State v. Langlois neutral
la · 1997
1 sentence

1998In State v. Langlois, 96-0084 (La.App. 4th Cir. 5/21/97), 695 So.2d 540 , writ granted on other grounds and remanded, 97-1491 (La.11/14/97), 703 So.2d 1281 , the defendant, whose first multiple offender adjudication had been vacated, argued that the fifteen- to seventeen-month delay in holding a second multiple offender hearing was unreasonable.

11998–1998
Charles Edwin Bullard v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections yellow
ca5 · 1982
1 sentence

1997Langlois relies on Bullington v. Missouri, 451 U.S. 430 , 101 S.Ct. 1852 , 68 L.Ed.2d 270 (1981), a case involving a capital sentencing proceeding, and Bullard v. Estelle, 665 F.2d 1347 (5th Cir.1982), judgment vacated, Estelle v. Bullard, 459 U.S. 1139 , 103 S.Ct. 776 , 74 L.Ed.2d 987 (1983), a case in which the United States Fifth Circuit determined that double jeopardy *543 attached in some Texas habitual offender proceedings.

11997–1997
Bullington v. Missouri green
scotus · 1981
2 sentences

1997Langlois relies on Bullington v. Missouri, 451 U.S. 430 , 101 S.Ct. 1852 , 68 L.Ed.2d 270 (1981), a case involving a capital sentencing proceeding, and Bullard v. Estelle, 665 F.2d 1347 (5th Cir.1982), judgment vacated, Estelle v. Bullard, 459 U.S. 1139 , 103 S.Ct. 776 , 74 L.Ed.2d 987 (1983), a case in which the United States Fifth Circuit determined that double jeopardy *543 attached in some Texas habitual offender proceedings.

1997Langlois relies on Bullington v. Missouri, 451 U.S. 430 , 101 S.Ct. 1852 , 68 L.Ed.2d 270 (1981), a case involving a capital sentencing proceeding, and Bullard v. Estelle, 665 F.2d 1347 (5th Cir.1982), judgment vacated, Estelle v. Bullard, 459 U.S. 1139 , 103 S.Ct. 776 , 74 L.Ed.2d 987 (1983), a case in which the United States Fifth Circuit determined that double jeopardy *543 attached in some Texas habitual offender proceedings.

11997–1997
Estelle v. Bullard green
scotus · 1983
2 sentences

1997Langlois relies on Bullington v. Missouri, 451 U.S. 430 , 101 S.Ct. 1852 , 68 L.Ed.2d 270 (1981), a case involving a capital sentencing proceeding, and Bullard v. Estelle, 665 F.2d 1347 (5th Cir.1982), judgment vacated, Estelle v. Bullard, 459 U.S. 1139 , 103 S.Ct. 776 , 74 L.Ed.2d 987 (1983), a case in which the United States Fifth Circuit determined that double jeopardy *543 attached in some Texas habitual offender proceedings.

1997Langlois relies on Bullington v. Missouri, 451 U.S. 430 , 101 S.Ct. 1852 , 68 L.Ed.2d 270 (1981), a case involving a capital sentencing proceeding, and Bullard v. Estelle, 665 F.2d 1347 (5th Cir.1982), judgment vacated, Estelle v. Bullard, 459 U.S. 1139 , 103 S.Ct. 776 , 74 L.Ed.2d 987 (1983), a case in which the United States Fifth Circuit determined that double jeopardy *543 attached in some Texas habitual offender proceedings.

11997–1997
State v. Langlois green
lactapp · 1993
1 sentence

1997In State v. Langlois, supra ., handed down on May 27, 1993, this Court stated that another multiple offender hearing was not precluded.

11997–1997
Lockhart v. Nelson green
scotus · 1988
2 sentences

1989State v. Jackson, 298 So.2d 777 (La., 1974); State v. Montana, 332 So.2d 248 (La., 1976); State v. Alexander, 325 So.2d 777 (La., 1976); State v. Sanders, 337 So.2d 1131 (La., 1976)." We have been referred to the recently decided case of Lockhart v. Nelson, ___ U.S. ___, 109 S.Ct. 285 , 102 L.Ed.2d 265 (1988).

1989State v. Jackson, 298 So.2d 777 (La., 1974); State v. Montana, 332 So.2d 248 (La., 1976); State v. Alexander, 325 So.2d 777 (La., 1976); State v. Sanders, 337 So.2d 1131 (La., 1976)." We have been referred to the recently decided case of Lockhart v. Nelson, ___ U.S. ___, 109 S.Ct. 285 , 102 L.Ed.2d 265 (1988).

11989–1989

Statutes the citing opinions construe

LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 15:529.1 (4)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check