immaterial exception (Massachusetts) · Go Syfert
← Massachusetts issues

immaterial exception in Massachusetts

5 Massachusetts opinions name it 1 courts 1913–1981 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Massachusetts courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Town of Nantucket v. Beineckegreen
mass · 1979 · cited in 1 Massachusetts opinions naming this issue, 1981–1981
1 sentence

1981Dismissing an action brought in the Probate Court under these circumstances would circumvent the legislative intent to “encourage a broader availability of personnel... for the hearing of all causes.” Cf. Nantucket v. Beinecke, 379 Mass. 345, 352 (1979). 7 We do not decide what rights, if any, are granted to the licensee under State law in the application for, suspension of, or failure to renew a license under § 183A.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Massachusetts. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Burgess v. Mayor of Brockton green
· 1920
1 sentence

1951Ed.) c. 159A, including (§1) the initial right, with immaterial exceptions (§§ 3, 5), to approve or not to approve a license application (Burgess v. Mayor & Aldermen of Brockton, 235 Mass. 95, 102 ), a license once approved by it is subject to the paramount authority of the department of public utilities, which has “general supervision and regulation of, and jurisdiction and control over such common carriers to the same extent as it has over railway companies,” with an immaterial exception (§ 10). 1 It is true that a “license shall specify the route or routes over which the motor vehicles used

11951–1951
Leonard v. Speidel green
· 1870
1 sentence

1935Leonard v. Speidel, 104 Mass. 356 .

11935–1935
Turnbull v. Longacre Bank green
ny · 1928
1 sentence

1935Turnbull v. Longacre Bank, 249 N. Y. 159 .

11935–1935
Burns v. Jones green
mass · 1912
1 sentence

1913Burns v. Jones, 211 Mass. 475 .

11913–1913

Where else courts name it

TX 8 (1883–1946) AL 8 (1860–1948) CA 8 (1897–2024) MA 5 (1913–1981) MO 4 (1904–2024) CT 4 (1953–1988) NY 4 (1931–1969) KY 3 (1916–1930) FL 2 (1935–2015) NC 2 (2021–2021) PA 2 (1914–2020) LA 2 (1940–1971) WI 2 (1926–2007) MI 2 (1908–2026)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check