Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 2008–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Dickey v. Stategreen2 sentences2024Additionally, Maryland Rule 4- 325(c) requires “the giving of a requested instruction when[:] . . . (1) the instruction is a correct statement of law; (2) the instruction is applicable to the facts of the case; and (3) the content of the instruction was not fairly covered elsewhere in instructions actually given.” Dickey v. State, 404 Md. 187 , 197-98, 946 A.2d 444, 450 (2008). 2024Additionally, Maryland Rule 4- 325(c) requires “the giving of a requested instruction when[:] . . . (1) the instruction is a correct statement of law; (2) the instruction is applicable to the facts of the case; and (3) the content of the instruction was not fairly covered elsewhere in instructions actually given.” Dickey v. State, 404 Md. 187 , 197-98, 946 A.2d 444, 450 (2008). | 1 | 3 |
Thompson v. Stategreen2 sentences2008Thompson v. State, 393 Md. 291, 302-03, 901 A.2d 208, 214 (2006); Patterson v. State, 356 Md. 677, 683-84 , 741 A.2d 1119, 1122 (1999). 2008Thompson v. State, 393 Md. 291, 302-03, 901 A.2d 208, 214 (2006); Patterson v. State, 356 Md. 677, 683-84 , 741 A.2d 1119, 1122 (1999). | 1 | 1 |
Patterson v. Stategreen2 sentences2008Thompson v. State, 393 Md. 291, 302-03, 901 A.2d 208, 214 (2006); Patterson v. State, 356 Md. 677, 683-84 , 741 A.2d 1119, 1122 (1999). 2008Thompson v. State, 393 Md. 291, 302-03, 901 A.2d 208, 214 (2006); Patterson v. State, 356 Md. 677, 683-84 , 741 A.2d 1119, 1122 (1999). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Dykes v. State
green
2 sentences2012In Dykes v. State, 319 Md. 206, 216 , 571 A.2d 1251 (1990), the Court of Appeals observed that a defendant need only produce initially “some evidence” to support the giving of a requested instruction. 2012In Dykes v. State, 319 Md. 206, 216 , 571 A.2d 1251 (1990), the Court of Appeals observed that a defendant need only produce initially “some evidence” to support the giving of a requested instruction. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.