evaluate rule (Idaho) · Go Syfert
← Idaho issues

evaluate rule in Idaho

41 Idaho opinions name it 1 courts 2013–2025 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
F. Kim Bailey v. Kerry Baileygreen
idaho · 2012 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025
2 sentences

2025Bailey v. Bailey, 153 Idaho 526, 531 , 284 P.3d 970, 975 (2012).

2025Bailey v. Bailey, 153 Idaho 526, 531 , 284 P.3d 970, 975 (2012).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Andrew Dallas Morgan green
idahoctapp · 2012
2 sentences

2014Id.

2014Id.

402013–2014

Statutes the citing opinions construe

ID § Idaho Code § 19-2603 (24) ID § Idaho Code § 1-2402 (9) ID § Idaho Code § 1-2403 (9) ID § Idaho Code § 1-2406 (9) ID § Idaho Code § 18-1401 (7) ID § Idaho Code § 18-2403 (7) ID § Idaho Code § 18-8004 (7)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

ID 41 (2013–2025) NM 25 (2015–2025) CA 6 (1980–2025) MI 5 (2006–2025) IL 3 (1983–2022) VT 3 (2008–2018) MA 2 (2017–2025) PA 2 (2008–2026)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check