Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
25 New Mexico opinions name it 1 courts 2015–2025 12 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Mexico courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Headley v. Morgan Management Corp.green2 sentences2025Corp., 2005-NMCA-045, ¶ 15 , 137 N.M. 339 , 110 P.3d 1076 (declining to entertain a cursory argument that included no explanation of the party’s argument and no facts that would allow this Court to evaluate the claim). 2025Corp., 2005-NMCA-045, ¶ 15 , 137 N.M. 339 , 110 P.3d 1076 (declining to entertain a cursory argument that included no explanation of the party’s argument and no facts that would allow this Court to evaluate the claim). | 4 | 25 |
Crutchfield v. New Mexico Department of Taxation & Revenuegreen2 sentences2022Corp., 2005-NMCA-045, ¶ 15 , 137 N.M. 339 , 110 P.3d 1076 (declining to entertain a cursory argument that included no explanation of the party’s argument and no facts that would allow the Court to evaluate the claim); Crutchfield v. N.M. Dep’t of Tax’n & Revenue, 2005-NMCA-022, ¶ 14 , 137 N.M. 26 , 106 P.3d 1273 (“Absent . . . citation to the record [where a ruling was invoked] or any obvious preservation, we will not consider the issue.”). 4Worker does not challenge the reasonableness of this rate. 2022Corp., 2005-NMCA-045, ¶ 15 , 137 N.M. 339 , 110 P.3d 1076 (declining to entertain a cursory argument that included no explanation of the party’s argument and no facts that would allow the Court to evaluate the claim); Crutchfield v. N.M. Dep’t of Tax’n & Revenue, 2005-NMCA-022, ¶ 14 , 137 N.M. 26 , 106 P.3d 1273 (“Absent . . . citation to the record [where a ruling was invoked] or any obvious preservation, we will not consider the issue.”). 4Worker does not challenge the reasonableness of this rate. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Ortizgreen2 sentences2022See State v. Ortiz, 2009-NMCA-092, ¶ 32 , 146 N.M. 873 , 215 P.3d 811 (refusing to address undeveloped, conclusory arguments, reasoning that “[a] party cannot throw out legal theories without connecting them to any elements and any factual support for the elements” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)); see also Headley, 2005-NMCA-045, ¶ 15 (declining to entertain a cursory argument that included no explanation of the party’s argument and no facts that would allow the Court to evaluate the claim). {10} Plaintiff also argues that his expert should have been allowed to render an opini 2022See State v. Ortiz, 2009-NMCA-092, ¶ 32 , 146 N.M. 873 , 215 P.3d 811 (refusing to address undeveloped, conclusory arguments, reasoning that “[a] party cannot throw out legal theories without connecting them to any elements and any factual support for the elements” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)); see also Headley, 2005-NMCA-045, ¶ 15 (declining to entertain a cursory argument that included no explanation of the party’s argument and no facts that would allow the Court to evaluate the claim). {10} Plaintiff also argues that his expert should have been allowed to render an opini | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Mexico. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Elane Photography, LLC v. Willock
green
2 sentences2018"To rule on an inadequately briefed issue, [the appellate courts] would have to develop the arguments itself, effectively performing the parties' work for them." Elane Photography, LLC v. Willock , 2013-NMSC-040 , ¶ 70, 309 P.3d 53 . 2017“To rule on an inadequately briefed 3 issue, this Court would have to develop the arguments itself, effectively performing 4 the parties’ work for them.” Elane Photography, LLC v. Willock, 2013-NMSC-040 , 5 ¶ 70, 309 P.3d 53 . | 2 | 2017–2018 |
Treloar v. County of Chaves
green
2 sentences2022Further, to the extent Plaintiffs’ arguments implicitly challenge the broader applicability of the Act to the subsidy benefits at issue, we examine whether Plaintiffs persuade this Court of error in the district court’s conclusions regarding the Act’s applicability. 4 {6} “The purpose of [the Act] is to prevent counties and municipalities from contracting debts that they are not able to pay.” Treloar v. Cnty. of Chaves, 2001- NMCA-074, ¶ 23, 130 N.M. 794 , 32 P.3d 803 . 2022Further, to the extent Plaintiffs’ arguments implicitly challenge the broader applicability of the Act to the subsidy benefits at issue, we examine whether Plaintiffs persuade this Court of error in the district court’s conclusions regarding the Act’s applicability. 4 {6} “The purpose of [the Act] is to prevent counties and municipalities from contracting debts that they are not able to pay.” Treloar v. Cnty. of Chaves, 2001- NMCA-074, ¶ 23, 130 N.M. 794 , 32 P.3d 803 . | 1 | 2022–2022 |
ITT Educational Services, Inc. v. Taxation & Revenue Department
green
2 sentences2020Servs., Inc. v. Taxation & Revenue Dep’t, 1998-NMCA-078, ¶ 10 , 125 N.M. 244 , 959 P.2d 969 (explaining that this court will not consider issues that are unsupported by authority); cf. In re Adoption of Francisco A., 1993-NMCA-144 , ¶ 20, 116 N.M. 708 , 866 P.2d 1175 (“It is well established in New Mexico that parents do not have absolute rights in their children; rather, parental rights are secondary to the best interests and welfare of the children.”). 2020Servs., Inc. v. Taxation & Revenue Dep’t, 1998-NMCA-078, ¶ 10 , 125 N.M. 244 , 959 P.2d 969 (explaining that this court will not consider issues that are unsupported by authority); cf. In re Adoption of Francisco A., 1993-NMCA-144 , ¶ 20, 116 N.M. 708 , 866 P.2d 1175 (“It is well established in New Mexico that parents do not have absolute rights in their children; rather, parental rights are secondary to the best interests and welfare of the children.”). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Vest v. State Ex Rel. New Mexico Human Services Department
green
2 sentences2020Servs., Inc. v. Taxation & Revenue Dep’t, 1998-NMCA-078, ¶ 10 , 125 N.M. 244 , 959 P.2d 969 (explaining that this court will not consider issues that are unsupported by authority); cf. In re Adoption of Francisco A., 1993-NMCA-144 , ¶ 20, 116 N.M. 708 , 866 P.2d 1175 (“It is well established in New Mexico that parents do not have absolute rights in their children; rather, parental rights are secondary to the best interests and welfare of the children.”). 2020Servs., Inc. v. Taxation & Revenue Dep’t, 1998-NMCA-078, ¶ 10 , 125 N.M. 244 , 959 P.2d 969 (explaining that this court will not consider issues that are unsupported by authority); cf. In re Adoption of Francisco A., 1993-NMCA-144 , ¶ 20, 116 N.M. 708 , 866 P.2d 1175 (“It is well established in New Mexico that parents do not have absolute rights in their children; rather, parental rights are secondary to the best interests and welfare of the children.”). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Chan v. Montoya
green
2 sentences2020Corp., 2005- NMCA-045, ¶ 15, 137 N.M. 339 , 110 P.3d 1076 (declining to entertain a cursory argument that included no explanation of the party’s argument and no facts that would allow the Court to evaluate the claim). {8} Finally, Mother has broadly asserted, without citation to authority, that this case “should have been addressed by something other than an adjudication of abuse and neglect and the placement of one child in congregate care and one in a foster home.” [MIO 11] However, “[t]he mere assertions and arguments of counsel are not evidence.” Chan v. Montoya, 2011-NMCA-072, ¶ 9 , 150 N 2020Corp., 2005- NMCA-045, ¶ 15, 137 N.M. 339 , 110 P.3d 1076 (declining to entertain a cursory argument that included no explanation of the party’s argument and no facts that would allow the Court to evaluate the claim). {8} Finally, Mother has broadly asserted, without citation to authority, that this case “should have been addressed by something other than an adjudication of abuse and neglect and the placement of one child in congregate care and one in a foster home.” [MIO 11] However, “[t]he mere assertions and arguments of counsel are not evidence.” Chan v. Montoya, 2011-NMCA-072, ¶ 9 , 150 N | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.