Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1951–1997 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Trimble v. Gordon
green
2 sentences1978Trimble v Gordon, 430 US 762, 767 ; 97 S Ct 1459 ; 52 L Ed 2d 31 (1977). 1978Trimble v Gordon, 430 US 762, 767 ; 97 S Ct 1459 ; 52 L Ed 2d 31 (1977). | 2 | 1978–1978 |
People v. Burks
green
2 sentences1997This Court has previously held that MCL 791.233b; MSA 28.2303(3) “is not unconstitutional as a denial of due process and equal protection of the laws in violation of the federal and state constitutions.” People v Burks, 128 Mich App 255, 257 ; 339 NW2d 734 (1983). 1997This Court has previously held that MCL 791.233b; MSA 28.2303(3) “is not unconstitutional as a denial of due process and equal protection of the laws in violation of the federal and state constitutions.” People v Burks, 128 Mich App 255, 257 ; 339 NW2d 734 (1983). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Williams v. Mayor of Baltimore
green
2 sentences1982In Williams v Mayor & City Council of Baltimore, 289 US 36, 40 ; 53 S Ct 431 ; 77 L Ed 1015 (1933), the Court said: "There is error in the holding of the Circuit Court of Appeals that the statute of Maryland creating this exemption is a denial to the respondents of the equal protection of the laws in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. 1982In Williams v Mayor & City Council of Baltimore, 289 US 36, 40 ; 53 S Ct 431 ; 77 L Ed 1015 (1933), the Court said: "There is error in the holding of the Circuit Court of Appeals that the statute of Maryland creating this exemption is a denial to the respondents of the equal protection of the laws in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Leonhard v. Richardson
green
1 sentence1982"A municipal corporation, created by a state for the better ordering of government, has no privileges or immunities under the federal constitution which it may invoke in opposition to the will of its creator.” See also New York v Richardson, 473 F2d 923, 929 (CA 2, 1973), cert den sub nom Lavine v Lindsay, 412 US 950 ; 93 S Ct 3012 ; 37 L Ed 2d 1002 (1973). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Robbins v. Noble Drilling Co.
green
1 sentence1982"A municipal corporation, created by a state for the better ordering of government, has no privileges or immunities under the federal constitution which it may invoke in opposition to the will of its creator.” See also New York v Richardson, 473 F2d 923, 929 (CA 2, 1973), cert den sub nom Lavine v Lindsay, 412 US 950 ; 93 S Ct 3012 ; 37 L Ed 2d 1002 (1973). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Lavine v. Lindsay
green
1 sentence1982"A municipal corporation, created by a state for the better ordering of government, has no privileges or immunities under the federal constitution which it may invoke in opposition to the will of its creator.” See also New York v Richardson, 473 F2d 923, 929 (CA 2, 1973), cert den sub nom Lavine v Lindsay, 412 US 950 ; 93 S Ct 3012 ; 37 L Ed 2d 1002 (1973). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Baker v. State Land Office Board
green
1 sentence1951The plaintiff next claims that the amendment is unconstitutionally discriminative and denies the plaintiff equal protection of the laws in violation of the 14th amendment to United States Constitution, for section (a) prohibits a life or accident insurance company from being interested in a mortuary, et cetera, but permits sick or funeral benefit associations to do so; and section (c) makes it unlawful for a funeral director to be licensed as an agent of any life insurance company, but does not make it unlaw *193 ful for a funeral director to represent a sick or funeral benefit company.' “The | 1 | 1951–1951 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.